Salesforce PDII Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II ( Plat-Dev-301 ) Exam Practice Test

When a trigger unexpectedly executes twice (recursion), it is typically due to the Salesforce Order of Execution. A common cause is a workflow rule, process, or flow updating the same record that initiated the transaction, which re-triggers the original Apex trigger. To identify exactly where this second execution is being initiated, the most effective technique is to use system.debug() statements in conjunction with the Developer Console logs (Option D).

By placing debug statements at the start of the trigger (e.g., System.debug('Trigger Fired');), the developer can examine the execution log to see how many times that line appears. More importantly, the execution log provides a hierarchical "trace" of the entire transaction. The developer can look for entries like FLOW_CREATE_INTERVIEW or WF_RULE_EVAL_BEGIN between the two trigger execution blocks. This trace reveals exactly which automation (Flow, Workflow, or another Trigger) caused the record to be updated a second time.

Option A is inefficient and disruptive to production environments. Option B is too broad and doesn't provide the internal execution context. Option C checks for code validity but does not diagnose runtime logic issues in a live environment. Tracing the execution through logs is the standard programmatic way to debug recursion and side effects in Salesforce.

Salesforce has a strict rule: You cannot perform a synchronous web service callout after performing a DML operation in the same transaction. In the provided code, the insert operations (DML) occur first, creating "uncommitted work" in the database. When the code then tries to execute makeRestCallout, the platform throws the error to prevent a long-running callout from holding database locks open.

To resolve this, the callout must be moved to its own separate transaction. The most straightforward way to do this is to change the callout method to an @future(callout=true) method (Option B). When an @future method is called, the request is queued and executed in a new, independent transaction with its own governor limits. This decouples the database "work" from the external "callout."

Option A is incorrect because simply moving the line doesn't change the transaction context. Option C (removing savepoints) doesn't help because the DML itself is the blocker. Option D (@InvocableMethod) is used for Flow/Process Builder and doesn't inherently solve the transaction boundary issue. Using an @future method (or a Queueable class) is the standard platform-aligned solution for this error.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation:

To 41ensure "all-or-nothing" behavior across multiple, distinct DML operations (such as an insert followed by a delete), a developer must manage the transaction boundary manually. In Apex, while a single insert statement is atomic, multiple statements are not automatically linked; if the second statement fails, the first statement's changes would typically remain committed to the database.

The correct implementation is to use Savepoints (Option B). By calling Database.setSavepoint(), the developer marks a specific state of the database. All subsequent DML operations are wrapped in a try-catch block. If an exception occurs during any of the operations, the code enters the catch block, where Database.rollback(sp) is called. This command reverts the database to the exact state it was in when the savepoint was created, effectively undoing any successful DML that occurred before the error.

Option A (SaveResults) allows for partial success, which contradicts the requirement to "prevent all execution." Option C (manual cleanup) is error-prone and cannot reliably revert system-generated fields or complex triggers. Option D (addError) is used in triggers to block a transaction but does not provide the programmatic rollback control needed for general Apex logic involving multiple lists.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The lightning-layout grid system uses a 12-column model. To achieve a responsive design, developers use attributes that target different screen breakpoints.

size: Defines the default size (usually targeting the smallest devices if no other attributes are present).

medium-device-size: Targets tablets and small desktops.

large-device-size: Targets large monitors.

To show one column on a phone, an item must occupy all 12 columns (size="12"). To show two columns on a tablet/desktop, each item must occupy 6 columns (medium-device-size="6").

Option A correctly implements this. While small-device-size exists, the size attribute itself typically serves as the baseline for small devices. If you set size="12" and medium-device-size="6", the component will "stack" on phones and sit side-by-side on anything larger.

This requirement specifies two critical constraints: the operations take a long time (likely exceeding synchronous CPU and timeout limits) and they must be performed sequentially.

Queueable Apex (Option D) is the optimal solution because it supports job chaining. Chaining allows one Queueable job to enqueue another Queueable job from its execute() method. This effectively creates a sequence where Job B only starts after Job A has successfully finished. Each job in the chain starts with a fresh set of governor limits, which is essential for "extensive database operations" and long-running callouts.

Option C (@future) is unsuitable because future methods cannot be chained; you cannot call one future method from another. Furthermore, the order in which multiple future methods execute is not guaranteed by the platform, violating the "sequential" requirement. Option A (Apex Scheduler) is intended for delayed or recurring tasks and is not designed for managing immediate sequential dependencies. Option B is a defensive coding practice but does not solve the underlying need to complete the work. Queueable Apex provides the programmatic control needed to manage complex, multi-step asynchronous workflows safely.

The "SOQL query not selective enough" error occurs when a query on an object with a large volume of records (typically over 200,000) does not use a filtered index to narrow down the result set effectively. In Sales1force,2 the query optimizer must be able to use an index to scan a small enough percentage of the total records to maintain performance. When a query filters on a non-indexed field, the system is forced to perform a full table scan, which triggers this exception to prevent performance degradation.

To resolve this, the developer must ensure that the field used in the WHERE clause is indexed. Marking a custom field as an "External ID" or "Unique" automatically creates a custom index on that field. By marking ERP_Number__c as an External ID, the platform generates a underlying database index, allowing the query optimizer to quickly locate matching records without scanning the entire table. While the LIKE operator with a trailing wildcard (e.g., 'Text%') can utilize an index, it will only be considered "selective" if the filter narrow the results below the platform's selectivity thresholds (typically 10% of the first million records). Making the field an External ID is the standard programmatic solution to provide the necessary indexing for selectivity. Option A is incorrect because moving a non-selective query to an asynchronous process does not change the fact that it is non-selective; it will still fail.

==========

In a multi-user environment, a "Race Condition" occurs when two users query the same record at the same time, see that Is_Registered__c is false, and both proceed to update it. To prevent this, developers must implement Row-Level Locking.

In Salesforce SOQL, the FOR UPDATE (Option C) keyword is used for this exact purpose. When a query includes FOR UPDATE, the platform places an exclusive lock on the records returned. If a second transaction attempts to query the same records using FOR UPDATE, it will be forced to wait until the first transaction is completed (either committed or rolled back). If the lock isn't released within 10 seconds, the second transaction throws a QueryException.

By using FOR UPDATE, the first user who executes the query "reserves" the Account. The second user's request will wait, and by the time their query actually executes and retrieves the data, Is_Registered__c will have been updated to true by the first user, thus failing the if (!account.Is_Registered__c) check and preventing a duplicate registration. Option D is a manual "optimistic locking" approach that is less reliable than the platform's native locking mechanism. Options A and B do not address the timing issue of the initial check.

123

To properly test a Visualforce Controller Extension in Apex, the developer must replicate the instantiation process used by the Lightning Platform at runtime. A4 controller extension is a class whose constructor is specifically defined to accept a single parameter of the type ApexPages.StandardController. 5The standard controller acts as the bridge b6etween the custom extension logic and the underlying Salesforce record (in this case, an Account).

In the provided test method, a record acet has been inserted into the database. To create the extension object, the developer must first instantiate the StandardController by passing the acet SObject record into its constructor. Once the standard controller instance (e.g., sc) is created, it is then passed into the constructor of the AccountControllerExt class. Option B is the correct implementation of this two-step pattern. Option C is incorrect because the StandardController constructor requires a full SObject record, not just an ID string. Options A and D are incorrect because extension classes do not support constructors that take an SObject or an ID directly; they specifically require the StandardController object to provide the necessary context for standard actions and fields. Following the correct pattern ensures the test accurately simulates the page execution context.

==========

In Salesforce integration, the Upsert operation is highly powerful because it allows you to create or update records and relate them to other records using External IDs instead of Salesforce record IDs ($001...$).

When the ERP system sends an order, it may not know the 18-character Salesforce ID for the Account, but it does know the ERP_Customer_ID__c. By performing an Upsert on the Order__c object (Option A), the integration can leverage "Foreign Key" syntax in the API payload. This essentially tells Salesforce: "Create this Order and link its Account__c lookup field to the Account that has this specific ERP_Customer_ID__c."

This approach is the "Gold Standard" for integrations because:

It eliminates the need for the external system to perform a "lookup" query in Salesforce to find an ID before creating a record.

It reduces the total number of API calls, saving on governor limits.

It handles "idempotency," ensuring that if the same order is sent twice, it is updated rather than duplicated.

Options B, C, and D are less efficient. Upserting the Account (Option B) doesn't create the Order. Merging (Option C) is for deduplication. The Insert-then-Update approach (Option D) is an anti-pattern that doubles the required API calls and transaction overhead.

In Lightning Web Components (LWC), the component lifecycle is managed by standard Web Component lifecycle hooks. To run logic exactly once when the component is inserted into the Document Object Model (DOM), a developer should use the connectedCallback() method (Option B).

The connectedCallback() is the LWC equivalent of Aura's init event. It is the ideal place to:

Perform initial data fetching (via imperative Apex).

Initialize internal state or variables.

Subscribe to a Lightning Message Service (LMS) channel.

Establish communication with the parent component.

Option A and D are Aura-specific syntax and are not valid in LWC. Option C (renderedCallback()) runs every time the component finishes a render cycle. Because a component can re-render many times (whenever a reactive property changes), placing initialization logic in renderedCallback can lead to performance issues or infinite loops if not guarded carefully. Therefore, connectedCallback() is the standard, most efficient way to handle "on load" logic in LWC.

The two symptoms described—slow load times and "Maximum view state size limit exceeded"—are both caused by Large Data Volumes (LDV) being handled improperly in the UI. When a user selects a filter that returns thousands of records, the SOQL query takes longer to execute, and the resulting list is stored in the controller's memory. Because Visualforce serializes all non-transient controller variables into a hidden form field (the View State), large lists quickly exceed the 135KB limit.

The correct resolution is to implement Pagination (Option D). By using the StandardSetController, a developer can easily manage large sets of data by loading only a small subset (e.g., 20 records) into the View State at a time. Users can then navigate through "Pages" of data. Alternatively, adding a LIMIT to the SOQL query prevents the application from attempting to process more data than the platform limits allow.123

Option A is incorrect because picklist fields can be indexed by Salesforce Support or if they are part of a custom index. Option B is the opposite of what is neede4d; adding transient reduces the View State. Option C adds unnecessary complexity without addressing the underlying data volume issue. Using a StandardSetController provides a built-5in, effi6cient way to handle large result sets while keeping the View State small and the page responsive.

When a data table experiences slow performance during filtering, the root cause is often "non-selective" queries that result in full table scans. In Salesforce, a query is selective when it uses an indexed field in the WHERE clause and filters down to a small percentage of the total records (typically 10% of the first million).

Option D is the correct strategy. By ensuring that the filter fields (such as a Status or Category) are either standard indexed fields or custom fields marked as "External ID" or "Unique" (which creates a custom index), the Query Optimizer can quickly locate the relevant rows. This significantly reduces the database processing time and the "Time to First Byte" (TTFB) returned to the Lightning component.

Option C might seem attractive for small datasets, but it is not scalable; if the org has 50,000 records, returning all of them to the client will crash the browser's heap memory. Option B (setStorable) is an Aura-specific concept and is replaced by @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true) in LWC, but even caching doesn't help if the initial query itself is slow. Option A (SOSL) is for text searching across multiple objects and is generally less efficient than a targeted SOQL query for specific field filtering. Using a selective SOQL query ensures the component remains fast as data volume grows.

16

The optimal architectural ap17proach for complex logic on a single object is to use a single trigger per object that delegates responsibilities to a helper class. This requirement involves two distinct types of logic: field manipulation (uppercase names) and cross-record updates (ensuring only one primary contact).

In Salesforce, Before triggers are ideal for updating fields on the record that initiated the trigger, as the changes are saved to the database without an additional DML statement. Therefore, converting the LastName to uppercase should occur in a before update and before insert context. Conversely, the "Is Primary" logic requires updating other records (de-selecting other contacts on the same account). This must happen in an After trigger context to ensure the primary record has been successfully updated and to avoid recursion or conflicts with the initial save.

Option D is the best practice because it follows the "One Trigger Per Object" design pattern. By using a single trigger with multiple context variables (isBefore, isAfter, isUpdate), the developer can cleanly route the "Last Name" logic to a before-save helper and the "Is Primary" cross-record update logic to an after-save helper. This centralized control prevents multiple triggers from firing in an unpredictable order and simplifies maintenance and debugging.

==========

58

This requirement addresses two distinct needs: a user interface for59 data collection and a technical solution for long-running HTTP callouts.

First, a Lightning Web Component (Option B) or a Screen Flow (Option C) could both be used to collect inputs. However, in the context of advanced development and the specific use of "Continuation," a Lightning Web Component is the standard modern pairing. It allows for a rich, interactive UI to gather the "key inputs" from the user.

Second, for the long-running callout, the developer should use an Apex method that returns a Continuation object (Option D). Standard synchronous callouts in Salesforce have a timeout limit (typically 10 seconds, max 120) and, more importantly, they "hold" a thread in the Salesforce application server. If many users perform long callouts simultaneously, the org can hit the "Concurrent Request" limit, blocking other users. The Continuation class allows the request to be handed off to a specialized Salesforce service that waits for the response asynchronously. Once the external service responds, the Continuation service "wakes up" the Apex callback method. This pattern is essential for long-running integrations as it doesn't count against concurrent request limits while the external system is processing, providing a much more scalable user experience.

==========

###

To build a responsive user interface in Lightning Web Components (LWC), developers rely on the layout system provided by the Lightning Design System (SLDS). This system is primarily implemented through two tightly coupled components: lightning-layout and lightning-layout-item.

lightning-layout acts as a flexible container (a flexbox wrapper). It allows developers to arrange child components in a row or column and manage horizontal and vertical alignment. It provides the overall structure for the grid. lightning-layout-item is the child component that resides within a lightning-layout. It is responsible for defining the actual proportions of the content across different breakpoints (small, medium, and large devices) using attributes like size, small-device-size, medium-device-size, and large-device-size.

Together, these two components allow a developer to specify exactly how much space a piece of content should occupy depending on the user's screen size. For example, a sidebar might occupy 100% of the width on a phone but only 25% on a desktop. lightning-input-location is a specific input field for geolocation data, and lightning-navigation is a service used for page routing; neither is involved in the visual responsiveness or structural layout of the component. Therefore, options B and D are the essential building blocks for responsive design.

==========

In Salesforce Apex, a @RemoteAction method must be defined as static. Static methods belong to the class itself rather than to a specific instance of the class. Therefore, when writing a unit test to verify the behavior of a RemoteAction, the method should be called using the class name notation (ClassName.methodName) rather than by instantiating the class first.

Option D correctly demonstrates the standard way to invoke a static method in Apex: Account a = MyRemoter.getAccount('TestAccount');. Because the method is static, it does not require the new keyword or a constructor to be called. Option A is incorrect because it attempts to call a static method on an instance variable (remote.getAccount), which is considered an illegal or improper reference in Apex. Option B is incorrect because it treats the RemoteAction like an instance method and assumes a non-existent constructor that takes a String. Option C is incorrect because it uses an undefined variable controller.

By calling the method statically in the test, the developer correctly simulates how the Visualforce Remoting engine calls the method from JavaScript at runtime. The assertion System.assertEquals then verifies that the record retrieved from the database matches the expected name, ensuring the search logic is functioning correctly.

The requirement involves enforcing a business rule across two different objects (Contact and Survey_Response__c) and through different entry points: standard UI/Triggers for Contacts and a custom Visualforce page for Survey Responses. Implementing the logic separately in a trigger and a controller (Option C) is a poor architectural choice because it duplicates code, leading to increased maintenance effort and a higher risk of inconsistency if the logic needs to change in the future. Validation rules (Option A) are also unsuitable here because they cannot natively perform a dynamic lookup against a list of records in a separate "Blocked Domains" object without complex and unscalable workarounds.

The optimal approach is to centralize the validation logic within a single "Helper" or "Service" class. This follows the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle of software development. By creating a shared method in a helper class, the developer can ensure that both the Contact trigger and the Visualforce controller use the exact same logic to verify email domains. This centralized method queries the custom object containing the blocked domains and returns a validation result. This architecture simplifies testing, ensures uniform enforcement of business rules across the entire platform, and allows administrators to update the blocked domains list without requiring any further code modifications.

==========

To create a responsive design in Salesforce Aura components, the lightning:layout and lightning:layoutItem components utilize a 12-column grid system based on the Salesforce Lightning Design System (SLDS). The issue in the original code is that size="6" is hardcoded, which forces each item to occupy 50% of the container width regardless of the screen size. On small mobile screens, 50% width is often insufficient for text content, leading to horizontal scrolling or overlapping.

Option B resolves this by using device-specific size attributes. By setting smallDeviceSize="12", each item is instructed to take up the full width (12 out of 12 columns) on mobile devices. This causes the items to stack vertically instead of sitting side-by-side. The mediumDeviceSize="6" and largeDeviceSize="6" attributes ensure that on tablets and desktop screens, the items return to a side-by-side layout (50% width each).

For this stacking to occur, the parent lightning:layout must have the multipleRows="true" attribute enabled. This allows the layout to wrap items to a new line once the total column count in a single row exceeds 12. Without multipleRows="true", the items would try to squeeze into a single line regardless of their individual size settings, which would not solve the horizontal scrolling problem. Option B is the only choice that correctly applies the grid logic to handle multiple breakpoints effectively.

When executing Salesforce Object Search Language (SOSL) queries within an Apex test context, the search engine does not actually search the database or the records created within the test setup by default. Instead, it returns an empty result set. This behavior ensures that tests run quickly and deterministically, without relying on the asynchronous indexing process of the full-text search engine.

To test code that utilizes SOSL, developers must define the expected search results explicitly using the Test.setFixedSearchResults(recordIds) method. This method accepts a list of Record IDs that the FIND clause should return. By implementing setFixedSearchResults in the test method before calling the searchFeature.searchRecords method, the SOSL query will return the specified test records, allowing the System.assertNotEquals assertion to pass. Options A (startTest/stopTest) helps with governor limits but does not fix SOSL results. Option B (SeeAllData) is generally discouraged and does not guarantee SOSL indexing availability. Option C (without sharing) affects record visibility but does not force the search engine to return un-indexed test data.

In Salesforce, when organization-wide defaults (OWD) are set to Private, users only have access to records they own or those shared with them through the role hierarchy or sharing rules. In this scenario, the requirement is to grant access dynamically based on a value in a lookup field (Quality_Controller__c). Criteria-based sharing rules (Option D) are generally used for field values that are static or belong to 1a predefined set, but they cannot dynamically target a specific user identified in a lookup field on the record itself.2

Apex managed sharing i3s the optimal solution for this requirement. It allows developers to programmatically create sharing records (shares) to grant access to specific users or groups. When a record is created or the Quality_Controller__c field is updated, an Apex trigger can insert a record into the Order__Share object. This share record would specify the UserOrGroupId as the ID from the lookup field and the AccessLevel as 'Read'. This approach is highly flexible and ensures that as the quality controller changes, the sharing access is updated accordingly. User managed sharing (Option A), often referred to as manual sharing, requires manual intervention by the record owner and cannot be fully "automatic" in the context of complex business logic without Apex. Therefore, Apex managed sharing provides the necessary automation and precision for record-level security based on dynamic lookup values.

==========

To display new data in a lightning-datatable, changes are required at both the Data Retrieval (Apex) layer and the UI Definition (JavaScript) layer.

First, the SOQL query in the Apex controller must be updated to include the address fields. While MailingAddress is a compound field in Salesforce, in a SOQL query intended for a datatable, it is often best to retrieve the individual components (e.g., MailingStreet, MailingCity, MailingState).

Second, the JavaScript controller for the LWC must be updated. The columns array in the JS file defines which data properties the lightning-datatable looks for. Even if the Apex method returns the address data, the datatable will not render it unless there is a corresponding column definition with the correct fieldName property.

Option D correctly identifies this two-step process. Option B is incomplete because the UI wouldn't know to show the new data. Option C is incorrect because you don't "extend" the component to add columns; you simply pass a configuration array. Option A is inefficient as it creates extra server round-trips for data that should be fetched in a single query. By aligning the SOQL fields with the datatable column definitions, the mailing address can be displayed seamlessly.

To optimize the performance of a Visualforce page that uses external assets, Static Resources (Option5 A) is the pl6atform-native best practice. Static resources allow you to upload content such as archives (.zip or .jar files), images, stylesheets, and JavaScript files that you can reference in a Visualforce page.

The primary benefits of using Static Resources over other methods (like hosting files externally or hardcoding styles) include:

Caching: Salesforce serves static resources from a Content Delivery Network (CDN). This means once a user's browser loads the JavaScript or CSS file, it is cached locally, significantly reducing page load times for subsequent requests.

Relative Referencing: Using the $Resource global variable (e.g., {!URLFOR($Resource.MyZipFile, 'styles/main.css')}) ensures that your page references the correct version of the file across different environments (Sandbox, Production) without changing hardcoded URLs.

Efficiency: By bundling related files into a single ZIP archive as a static resource, you reduce the number of HTTP requests the browser must make to render the page.

Options B and D are related to AJAX and JavaScript-to-Apex communication, and Option C is a component used for rendering data tables; none of these address the storage or caching of external front-end assets.

The failure of the assertion is caused by the with sharing keyword used in the AccountsController class and the context in which the test is running. The with sharing keyword enforces the sharing rules of the current user. In a test context, the code defaults to running as a System Administrator unless otherwise specified.

In the @TestSetup method, the developer created 10 accounts owned by a System Admin (user1) and 20 accounts owned by a Standard User (user2). When AccountsController.getAllAccounts() is called without a specific user context, it runs as the Admin and returns all 30 records. The assertion expects exactly 20 records (System.assertEquals(20, result.size())), which corresponds to the number of records owned by the Standard User.

To make the test pass, the developer must execute the method within the context of the Standard User. By querying user2 and using System.runAs(user2) (Option C), the sharing rules are enforced according to that user's perspective. Under with sharing, the Standard User will only "see" the 20 account records they own (assuming a Private OWD and no other sharing rules apply), thus satisfying the assertion. Option A is incorrect as seeAllData=true bypasses the test isolation. Option D would result in a count of 30 (or 10 if restricted), which still fails the assertion.

When managing integrations where endpoints (URLs) or authentication details are subject to change, Named Credentials (Option A) provide the most maintainable and secure solution. A Named Credential specifies the URL of a callout endpoint and its required authentication parameters in one definition. By referencing a Named Credential in Apex code (e.g., callout:MyExternalSystem/path), the developer abstracts the literal URL away fro1m the code itself.

If the URL changes, an administrator can simply update the Named Credential record in the Setup menu without requiring a code deployment or a change to the Apex class. Additionally, Named Credentials automatically handle the callout overhead for Remote Site Settings; you do not need to maintain a separate entry in Remote Site Settings if a Named Credential is used.

Connected Apps (Option B) are used to allow external applications to connect into Salesforce, not for making outbound callouts. Session IDs (Option D) are authentication tokens and do not manage endpoint URLs. By utilizing Named Credentials, developers ensure that their integration logic remains decoupled from environment-specific configurations, facilitating smoother transitions between sandboxes and production environments.

==========

This scenario presents two distinct requirements: processing a large volume of data (50,000 records) and running the process at a specific time (once a day after business hours).

Database.Batchable (Option B): Processing 50,000 records in a single synchronous transaction will exceed Apex Governor Limits (specifically the CPU time limit or the heap size limit). Batch Apex allows the system to process these records in smaller chunks (batches), ensuring that the calculation completes without hitting limits.

Schedulable (Option C): To ensure the job runs "once a day after business hours," the Schedulable interface is required. The developer allows the class to be scheduled via the Apex Scheduler or the UI.

The standard pattern for this use case is to create a class that implements Schedulable, and inside its execute method, instantiate and execute the Batch class (Database.executeBatch). This combines precise timing with bulk processing capabilities.

Handling date and time formatting across different countries is a common requirement in global Salesforce orgs. For example, a user in the US expects MM/DD/YYYY, while a user in the UK expects DD/MM/YYYY.

The Date.format() method (Option D) is specifically designed to handle this localization automatically. When called on a Date instance, it converts the value into a String based on the locale settings of the logged-in user. This is the most efficient and localized approach as it requires no manual mapping of date patterns.

Option A (Date.parse) is the inverse; it converts a localized String into a Date object. Option C (String.valueOf) returns a standard, non-localized format (YYYY-MM-DD), which is used for system logging or API payloads but is often confusing for end-users. Option B (String.format) is used for variable substitution within a string (e.g., "Hello {0}") and does not inherently handle date localization. By using the native .format() method, developers ensure a consistent and familiar user experience for employees worldwide.

When using lightning-record-edit-form, server-side validation rules (Option D) typically return errors one at a time as the database engine encounters them, or as a single combined toast message that can be difficult to parse. To provide a superi1or user experience where multiple fields are validated simultaneously before the data even reaches the server, the develo2per shou3ld implement Client-side validation (Option B).

In the component's JavaScript controller, the developer can intercept the onsubmit event. By iterating through all the lightning-input-field or standard lightning-input elements, the developer can programmatically check for various conditions (e.g., custom regex patterns, conditional logic between fields, or range checks). Each field can then be marked with a custom error message using the reportValidity() or setCustomValidity() methods. This allows the UI to highlight all invalid fields at once, providing immediate, comprehensive feedback to the user. This approach reduces unnecessary server round-trips and ensures that the user can correct all issues in a single pass before successfully submitting the record.

The lightning-layout and lightning-layout-item components utilize a 12-column grid system to create responsive layouts. In this system, "12" represents the full width of the container (one column), while "6" represents half the width (two columns side-by-side). To manage responsiveness across different screen sizes, Salesforce provides specific attributes that target different breakpoints.

The size attribute defines the default width for the smallest devices (mobile). By setting size="12", the item takes up the full width of the screen on mobile devices, resulting in a single-column stack. The medium-device-size attribute targets tablets and small desktop screens. By setting medium-device-size="6", the layout item is instructed to occupy only half of the grid (6 out of 12 columns) once the screen reaches the "medium" breakpoint. When two adjacent items both have this setting, they will sit side-by-side, creating a two-column layout.

Option C is the correct answer because medium-device-size is the standard attribute used to transition from a mobile view to a tablet/desktop view in the Lightning Design System (SLDS) grid logic. Using size="12" ensures the "one column" requirement for mobile, and medium-device-size="6" satisfies the "two columns" requirement for larger screens.

==========

Com31prehensive and Detailed 150 32to 250 words of Explanation:333435

In a Private sharing model36, record access is restricted to the own37er and users38 above them in the role hierarchy. To grant access to a user identified in a specific field (like a lookup), you need a dynamic sharing mechanism. Apex Managed Sharing (Option A) is the correct choice here because it allows a developer to programmatically create share records based on the value of the lookup field. When the Interviewer lookup is populated, a trigger can insert a record into the Candidate__Share object, granting the specified user 'Read' access.

Sharing rules (Option C) are generally too rigid for this scenario because they typically share records based on a static criteria or ownership, rather than a dynamic lookup to a User. Permission sets (Option B) grant object-level and field-level permissions but do not grant access to specific records that a user does not own in a Private OWD environment. Using Apex provides the necessary automation to ensure that as the interviewer changes, the sharing access is updated in real-time, maintaining a secure but functional interview process.

==========

When processing large data volumes in Apex, the "Heap Size" limit (6MB for synchronous, 12MB for asynchronous) is a common bottleneck. This limit tracks the amount of memory consumed by objects and variables currently in scope.

Option B utilizes the SOQL For Loop pattern. This is the most memory-efficient approach because it processes records in "chunks" of 200 at a time using internal query locators. Instead of loading the entire result set (potentially thousands of records) into a single collection in memory, the SOQL For Loop iterates through the records without ever holding the full set in the heap. This prevents the "Apex heap size too large" error when dealing with high-volume queries.

In contrast, Options A, C, and D all involve assigning the entire query result to a collection (a Map or List) before the loop begins. This immediately consumes heap space proportional to the number of records and fields retrieved. If the query returns a large number of records, these collections will quickly exceed the heap limit before the first line of the loop even executes. Therefore, for bulk data processing where memory efficiency is the priority, the inline SOQL For Loop (Option B) is the standard best practice.

In a Lightning Web Component's configuration file (.js-meta.xml), the tag allows the developer to specify which device form factors the component supports. To restrict the component to only render on desktop devices, the developer must specify the type="Large".

The structure is:

XML

If supportedFormFactors is not specified, the component defaults to supporting both Small (phone) and Large (desktop) form factors. Options B, C, and D are incorrect syntax for defining form factor support in LWC metadata.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words 13of Explanation:14

In a Private sharing model, access is strictly limited to owners and those grant15ed access through specific sharing mechanisms. Here, the requirement is to grant access based on a User lookup field residing on a child record (Reviewer__c) to the parent record (Defect__c).

Criteria-based sharing rules (B) are ineffective here because they can only evaluate fields on the record being shared (Defect__c) and cannot "look down" at values in related child records to determine access. "View All" (A) is too broad as it would grant the user access to every defect in the system, violating the private security model.

Apex managed sharing (D) is the correct choice. Because the relationship between the assigned reviewer and the defect is dynamic and based on a separate object, a developer can write an Apex trigger on the Reviewer__c object. When a reviewer record is created or updated, the trigger programmatically inserts a record into the Defect__Share table, granting 'Read' access to the User specified in the lookup field. This provides the precision required to ensure that only the designated reviewers can see specific defects, maintaining the integrity of the Private OWD while automating the necessary exceptions.

==========

When a requirement involves storing configuration or "secret" data that needs to vary based on the specific user or profile, Hierarchy Custom Settings (Option C) are the correct choice. Unlike Custom Metadata (Option B), which is available to the entire organization regardless of the user, Hierarchy Custom Settings use a built-in logic to provide values based on the "most specific" level defined.

The hierarchy follows a specific order: User > Profile > Organization. If a secret key is defined at the User level, that value is returned for that specific user. If not, the system looks for a value defined at the user's Profile level, and finally falls back to the Organization-wide default. This allows a developer to store sensitive keys or flags and restrict or vary them dynamically based on the current user's identity.

Custom Metadata is better suited for application-wide configurations that need to be deployable via packages, but it lacks the granular per-user/per-profile override capability inherent to Hierarchy Custom Settings. Static Resources (Option A) are public to anyone with access to the resource, and Cookies (Option D) are stored on the client side, making them insecure for "secret" data. Therefore, Custom Settings provide the best balance of security and hierarchical flexibility for this use case.

==========

Salesforce enforces a strict restriction: Actual network callouts are prohibited during unit tests. This is to ensure that tests are deterministic, fast, and do not rely on the availability or state of external third-party systems. When the testing engine encounters a System.Http.send() or a web service call without a mock, it throws the error: "Methods defined as TestMethod do no1t support Web servi2ce callouts."34

To resolve this, the developer must provide a Mock Implementation. By using Test.setMock() (Option D), the developer instructs the Apex runtime to intercept any callouts and return a pre-defined response instead of attempting a real connection. The mock class5 must implement either the HttpCalloutMock interface (for REST) or the WebServiceMock interface (for SOAP).

Furthermore, the call to the mock and the callout method should be wrapped in Test.startTest() and Test.stopTest().6

Test.startTest(): Resets governor limits, providing a fresh context for the specific logic being tested.7

Test.stopTest(): Forces any asynchronous processing (often used in cal8louts, such as @future or Queueable) to complete before the next line of code executes.

In the provided code, Test.setMock must be called before CalloutUtil.sendAccountUpdate for the platform to know which mock to use. Once Test.stopTest() is reached, the mock response is processed, the checkbox is updated, and the subsequent SOQL query and assertion will correctly see the updated data. Option A is a poor practice because it skips the logic entirely, resulting in 0% code coverage for the integration logic.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 25110 words of Explana12tion:

The Salesforce Lightning Inspector is a Chrome DevTools extension used to investigate and optimize Lightning components. When a page fails to show the most current reference data, the issue often lies within the client-side caching mechanism. The Storage tab (A) is specifically designed to help developers inspect the client-side data stores used by the Lightning Data Service (LDS) and custom component caching.

In this tab, a developer can view the contents of the various storage caches (such as actions, records, and lists). It allows the developer to see exactly what data is currently stored in the cache, its expiration time, and whether the data is being retrieved from the server or served directly from the cache. By analyzing the Storage tab, a developer can determine if a component is incorrectly holding onto "stale" data instead of refreshing from the server.

The Actions tab (C) is useful for monitoring the status of server-side controller actions, and the Event Log (B) tracks the sequence of application and component events. However, for a data consistency issue specifically related to caching, the Storage tab provides the most direct visibility into the underlying cause. Using this tool, a developer can verify if the cache invalidation logic is working correctly or if the storage limits are causing unexpected data eviction.

==========

In Salesforce, a callout cannot be made directly from an Apex trigger (Option C). This is a fundamental architectural restriction of the platform. Triggers execute as part of a database transaction. If a trigger were allowed to make a synchronous callout, the database transaction—along with all its associated row locks—would remain open while waiting for a response from the external system. This could lead to severe performance bottlenecks and transaction timeouts.

To perform a callout based on a trigger event, the developer must move the callout logic into an asynchronous context, such as a @future(callout=true) method, a Queueable class, or by publishing a Platform Event.

Option A is incorrect because while asynchronous methods allow for higher CPU time, they do not extend the maximum individual callout timeout (120 seconds). Option B is incorrect because REST is simply a protocol and does not dictate synchronicity. Option D is incorrect because the limit for callouts in a single transaction is 100, so 10 callouts would still be permissible in a synchronous context (assuming they aren't in a trigger). Consequently, the presence of a trigger is the only factor listed that programmatically mandates an asynchronous approach.