OMG OMG-OCSMP-MBA400 OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced Exam Practice Test

A V development approach is a systems engineering methodology that follows a V-shaped process model. The left side of the V represents the decomposition of requirements into system and subsystem specifications. The bottom of the V represents the integration and testing of system components. The right side of the V represents the verification and validation of system performance against requirements. A function to structure allocation relationship is pivotal in a V development approach, because it defines how the system functions are realized by the system structure (i.e., components). This relationship enables traceability and consistency between requirements, design, implementation, and testing

The main diagram type in Modelica corresponds most closely to the ibd (internal block diagram) in SysML. An ibd shows the internal structure of a block in terms of its parts, ports, connectors, and flows. It is similar to a Modelica diagram, which shows the components of a model in terms of their connectors and equations. Both diagram types can be used to represent physical systems composed of interconnected elements with defined behaviors and properties. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://modelica.org/documents/ModelicaSpec34.pdf

This aspect of a MBSE-based engineering project falls outside of the scope of AP233 because AP233 does not cover diagrams. AP233 (Application Protocol 233) is a standard that defines an information model for systems engineering. It specifies the concepts and relationships for representing systems engineering data, such as requirements, functions, properties, etc. AP233 does not define any notation or presentation for diagrams, such as SysML diagrams. AP233 only defines the serialization and deserialization of systems engineering data using XMI (XML Metadata Interchange) format. Therefore, AP233 does not address how to exchange diagrams between tools or how to visualize diagrams in different tools. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.omg.org/spec/AP233/About-AP233/

OCL is the most suitable and compatible language for placing formal pre-conditions and post-conditions on an activity diagram. OCL is part of the UML standard and can be integrated withSysML without any conflicts or inconsistencies. OCL can express complex logical expressions that can check the state of the system before and after an activity is executed. BPMN is a business process modeling language that is not compatible with SysML. English is a natural language that may not be precise or unambiguous enough for formal specifications. OWL is a web ontology language that is not designed for modeling activities or constraints. VSL is a value specification language that can only express simple values and expressions. XMI and XML are markup languages that are used for exchanging models between tools, not for specifying constraints on models. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.3

 This type of data exchange is considered file-based exchange because it involves transferring data between different tools using files as intermediaries. A file-based exchange is a common way of exchanging data between tools that do not have direct integration or compatibility. It requires the tools to support import and export functions for a common file format, such as CSV, XML, XMI, etc. A file-based exchange can be useful for transferring large amounts of data or for performing batch operations. However, it can also have some drawbacks, such as loss of information, lack of synchronization, or manual intervention. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/esdr/9.0.1?topic=tools-exchanging-model-data-by-using-xmi

The most important factors that the engineer should consider when advising the team on how MBSE methodology impacts the PLM solution are the spectrum of models the company uses across the system lifecycle, how model elements can be related to each other, and how theserelationships are supported by PLM tools. The spectrum of models refers to the different types, levels and views of models that are used to represent different aspects and phases of the system development, such as requirements, design, analysis, verification and validation. The relationships between model elements refer to the traceability, consistency and dependency links that connect different elements within and across models. The support by PLM tools refers to the ability of the tools to store, manage, access and integrate the models and their relationships throughout the system lifecycle. These factors are important because they affect how well the MBSE methodology can be implemented and executed using the PLM solution. How manufacturing, test and integration methods can be driven by system models is a less important factor that may not be relevant to all systems or projects. The high cost of maintaining modeling tools and modeling proficiency training is a less important factor that may not be specific to MBSE methodology or PLM solution. How well any proposed MBSE methodology interfaces with the company’s Model Driven Software Development methodology is a less important factor that may not apply to all systems or projects. How outputs of system models, software models, and hardware models are archived in Product Data Management (PDM) tools is a less important factor that may not reflect the full potential of MBSE methodology or PLM solution. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.5

A measure of model quality is a metric that evaluates how well a model satisfies some desired characteristics, such as correctness, completeness, consistency, clarity, etc. The number of actions and activities with no incoming object or control flows is a measure of model quality that indicates how well the model captures the dependencies and sequences of events in the system. A high number of such actions and activities may imply that the model is incomplete or inconsistent, and may lead to errors or ambiguities in the system behavior.

Tagged values can be defined only as attributes of stereotypes. A tagged value is an extension of a model element with additional information that is not part of its standard properties. A tagged value is defined by an attribute of a stereotype that is applied to the model element. The attribute specifies the name and type of the tagged value. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://www.ibm.com/docs/SSB2MU_8.2.0/com.ibm.rhp.sysml.doc/topics/rhp_c_dm_sysml_profile_features.html

The most effective way to verify such requirements is to have the Modelica solver also compute these scalar values from its time-based power usage results. Then import the resulting scalar values into SysML, and compare them to the requirements. This way, the verification can be done at the same level of abstraction as the requirements, and avoid unnecessary transformations or calculations in SysML. Modelica solvers can provide various functions and operators to compute scalar values from time-based results, such as max, min, mean, integral, etc. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://modelica.org/documents/ModelicaSpec34.pdf

This tool characteristic is required for this project because it ensures that the modeling tool follows the SysML abstract syntax, which defines the metamodel elements and their semantics. The abstract syntax is essential for ensuring consistency and interoperability between different tools and models. The concrete syntax, which defines the notation and presentation of the elements, can have some deviations as long as they do not affect the meaning or interpretation of the model. For example, a tool can use different colors or shapes for some elements without changing their semantics. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://sysml.org/docs/specs/OMG_SysML_1.6.pdf

This approach would be most effective from a MBSE perspective because it allows the system engineer to create a unified view of the design of the system and its components using SysML blocks and relationships. A block is an extension of the UML Class metaclass that can be used to model any system component with structure and behavior. A relationship is a connection between model elements that specifies some kind of dependency or association. By creating a SysML block structure representing the system and its components, the system engineer can capture the hierarchy, composition, classification, generalization, etc., of the system elements. By creating relationships between the blocks and the design models, such as MCAD, ECAD, or Spreadsheets, the system engineer can link the SysML model with the external models and provide traceability and consistency. The system engineer can also use the SysML model to generate a bill-of-materials for the system and its components, as well as to propagate changes made in one design model to another using allocation or synchronization mechanisms. References: https://www.omg.org/ocsmp/ocsmp-adv-exam.htm https://sysml.org/tutorials/sysml-diagram-tutorial/

OCL is a formal language that can be used to specify constraints on the elements and relationships of a model. OCL can access the properties and operations of the model elements and check their values and states. OCL is not intended to be transformed into code or to express any imaginable constraint. OCL may not be easily understood by engineers who are not familiar with its syntax and semantics. References: OMG-Certified Systems Modeling Professional - Model Builder – Advanced (OCUP2-ADV) Examination Guide Version 1.0, Section 4.3.1