Isaca CDPSE Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer Exam Practice Test

From a privacy perspective, it is most important to ensure data backups are encrypted. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm. Encryption can help protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data backups by preventing unauthorized access, disclosure, or modification. Encryption can also help comply with legal and regulatory requirements for data protection, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Encryption can be applied to data backups at different levels, such as file-level, disk-level, or network-level encryption.

Incremental backups, differential backups, or pseudonymization are also useful for data backup management, but they are not the most important from a privacy perspective. Incremental backups are backups that only copy the data that has changed since the last backup, whether it was a full, differential, or incremental backup. Incremental backups can help save storage space and time, but they do not directly protect the data from unauthorized access or disclosure. Differential backups are backups that only copy the data that has changed since the last full backup. Differential backups can also help save storage space and time, but they also do not directly protect the data from unauthorized access or disclosure. Pseudonymization is a process of replacing identifying information in data with artificial identifiers or pseudonyms. Pseudonymization can help enhance the privacy of data by reducing the linkability between data and data subjects, but it does not prevent re-identification or inference attacks.

A privacy impact assessment (PIA) is a systematic process of identifying and evaluating the potential privacy risks and impacts of a data processing activity or system. A PIA helps to ensure that privacy is considered and integrated into the design and development of data processing activities or systems, and that privacy risks are mitigated or eliminated. A PIA also helps to determine the appropriate retention periods for personal data based on the purpose and necessity of the data processing, as well as the legal and regulatory obligations that apply to the data. Therefore, a PIA helps to define data retention time in a stream-fed data lake that includes personal data. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 99

Inferred data is the type of data that is produced by using a more complex method of analytics to find correlations between data sets and using them to categorize or profile people. Inferred data is not directly observed or collected from the data subjects, but rather derived from other sources of data, such as behavioral, transactional, or demographic data. Inferred data can be used to make assumptions or predictions about the data subjects’ preferences, interests, behaviors, or characteristics12.

Anonymization (de-identification) is the PET that removes or irreversibly transforms identifiers so individuals are not identifiable, enabling safer secondary use and sharing. Controls like encryption in transit (D) and attribute-based access (C) restrict access or protect data in motion but do not prevent reidentification once data are accessed. Integrity checks (A) protect correctness, not privacy.

Key CDPSE-aligned phrasing (short extract): “Anonymization… renders personal data not identifiable to a data subject.”

Cryptographic erasure is a data sanitization method that uses encryption to render data unreadable and unrecoverable. It is the best method when there is a need to balance the destruction of data and the ability to recycle IT assets, because it does not damage the storage media and allows it to be reused or sold. It is also faster and more environmentally friendly than physical destruction methods.

The role primarily assigned to an internal data owner is authorizing access rights. A data owner is a person or a role within the organization who has the authority and responsibility for the data assets under their control. A data owner is responsible for defining the data classification, data quality, data retention, and data security requirements for their data assets. A data owner is also responsible for granting, revoking, and reviewing the access rights to their data assets based on the principle of least privilege and the business needs. A data owner is accountable for ensuring that the data assets are used in compliance with the organizational policies and the applicable laws and regulations. References:

[ISACA Glossary of Terms]

[ISACA CDPSE Review Manual, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1]

[ISACA CDPSE Review Manual, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2]

[ISACA CDPSE Review Manual, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.3]

User behavior analytics is a technology that uses data analysis and machine learning to monitor, detect and respond to anomalous or malicious user activities, such as accessing sensitive personal customer information to use for unauthorized purposes. User behavior analytics is the best choice to mitigate this risk, as it would help to identify and prevent insider threats, data breaches, fraud or misuse of data by authorized individuals. User behavior analytics can also help to enforce policies and controls, such as access control, audit trail or data loss prevention. The other options are not as effective as user behavior analytics in mitigating this risk. Email filtering system is a technology that scans and blocks incoming or outgoing emails that contain spam, malware or phishing attempts, but it does not address the issue of authorized individuals accessing sensitive personal customer information to use for unauthorized purposes. Intrusion monitoring is a technology that monitors and alerts on unauthorized or malicious attempts to access a system or network, but it does not address the issue of authorized individuals accessing sensitive personal customer information to use for unauthorized purposes. Mobile device management (MDM) is a technology that manages and secures mobile devices that are used to access or store organizational data, but it does not address the issue of authorized individuals accessing sensitive personal customer information to use for unauthorized purposes1, p. 92 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

The best way to ensure an organization’s enterprise risk management (ERM) framework can protect the organization from privacy harms is to complete a privacy risk assessment. A privacy risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the privacy risks that may affect the organization’s objectives, operations, stakeholders, and reputation. A privacy risk assessment helps to align the ERM framework with the privacy requirements, expectations, and obligations of the organization, as well as to prioritize and mitigate the privacy risks that may cause privacy harms. Privacy harms are the adverse consequences or impacts that may result from the unauthorized or inappropriate use, disclosure, or loss of personal data, such as financial loss, identity theft, discrimination, reputational damage, emotional distress, or physical harm.

The first consideration when selecting a data sanitization method is the type of storage device that holds the data to be sanitized. Different types of storage devices have different characteristics and limitations that affect the effectiveness and feasibility of data sanitization methods. For example, magnetic media, such as hard disk drives (HDDs), can be sanitized by data degaussing, which is wiping data permanently by weakening the magnetic field1. However, data degaussing is not applicable to devices that use solid state drive (SSD) technology, since SSDs do not store data magnetically2. Therefore, the storage type determines which data sanitization methods are suitable and available for the data disposal process.

The primary reason that a single cryptographic key should be used for only one purpose, such as encryption or authentication, is that it minimizes the risk if the cryptographic key is compromised. A cryptographic key is a piece of information that is used to perform cryptographic operations, such as encryption or authentication. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm. Authentication is a process of verifying the identity or integrity of a user or data using a secret key or algorithm. If a single cryptographic key is used for multiple purposes, such as encryption and authentication, it increases the risk if the cryptographic key is compromised. For example, if an attacker obtains the cryptographic key that is used for both encryption and authentication, they can decrypt and access personal data, as well as impersonate or modify legitimate users or data. Therefore, a single cryptographic key should be used for only one purpose, and different keys should be used for different purposes. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 107

Requiring independent audits of the providers’ data privacy controls is the best way to ensure third-party providers that process an organization’s personal data are addressed as part of the data privacy strategy. Independent audits can verify that the providers are complying with the applicable data privacy laws and regulations, as well as the organization’s own policies and standards. Independent audits can also identify any gaps or weaknesses in the providers’ data privacy controls and recommend corrective actions or improvements.

Sectoral is a privacy protection reference model that refers to a system of laws and regulations that apply to specific sectors or industries within a jurisdiction, such as health, finance, education or telecommunications. Sectoral privacy protection is typically characterized by having different rules and standards for different types of personal data or data processing activities, depending on the sensitivity and value of the data or the impact and risk of the processing. When a government’s health division established the complete privacy regulation for only the health market, it is using a sectoral privacy protection reference model, as it is addressing the specific needs and challenges of the health sector in terms of privacy protection. The other options are not applicable in this scenario. Co-regulatory is a privacy protection reference model that refers to a system of laws and regulations that are supplemented by self-regulation mechanisms, such as codes of conduct, standards or certification schemes, developed by industry associations or professional bodies with oversight from government agencies or regulators. Comprehensive is a privacy protection reference model that refers to a system of laws and regulations that apply to all sectors and industries within a jurisdiction, regardless of the type or nature of personal data or data processing activities. Self-regulatory is a privacy protection reference model that refers to a system of laws and regulations that rely on voluntary compliance by organizations with their own policies and procedures, without any external oversight or enforcement from government agencies or regulators1, p. 63-64 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

The first thing that an IT privacy practitioner should do before an organization migrates personal data from an on-premise solution to a cloud-hosted solution is to perform a privacy impact assessment (PIA). A PIA is a systematic process of identifying and evaluating the potential privacy risks and impacts of a data processing activity or system. A PIA helps to ensure that privacy is considered and integrated into the design and development of data processing activities or systems, and that privacy risks are mitigated or eliminated. A PIA also helps to determine the appropriate measures to protect personal data in a cloud-hosted solution, such as encryption, pseudonymization, anonymization, access control, audit trail, breach notification, etc. A PIA also helps to comply with the applicable privacy regulations and standards that govern data processing activities in a cloud-hosted solution. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 99

The first consideration for ensuring that endpoints are protected in line with the privacy policy is hardening the operating systems of endpoint devices. Hardening is a process of applying security configurations and controls to reduce the attack surface and vulnerabilities of an operating system. Hardening can include disabling unnecessary services and features, applying security patches and updates, enforcing strong passwords and encryption, configuring firewall and antivirus settings, and implementing least privilege principles. Hardening the operating systems of endpoint devices can help prevent unauthorized access, data leakage, malware infection, or other threats that may compromise the privacy of personal data stored or processed on those devices.

Detecting malicious access through endpoints, implementing network traffic filtering on endpoint devices, and managing remote access and control are also important aspects of endpoint security, but they are not the first consideration. Rather, they are dependent on or complementary to hardening the operating systems of endpoint devices. For example, detecting malicious access requires having a baseline of normal activity and behavior on the endpoint device, which can be established by hardening. Implementing network traffic filtering requires having a firewall or other network security tool installed and configured on the endpoint device, which is part of hardening. Managing remote access and control requires having authentication and authorization mechanisms in place on the endpoint device, which is also part of hardening.

Restricting access to authorized users is the best control to secure application programming interfaces (APIs) that may contain personal information, as it would prevent unauthorized access, modification or disclosure of the personal information by third parties or intermediaries. Restricting access to authorized users can be achieved by using various methods, such as authentication, authorization, encryption, tokens or certificates. The other options are not effective controls to secure APIs that may contain personal information. Encrypting APIs with the organization’s private key is not a feasible or desirable method, as it would make the APIs unreadable by anyone who does not have the corresponding public key, which would defeat the purpose of using APIs for interoperability and integration. Requiring nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) when sharing APIs is not a reliable or enforceable method, as it would depend on the compliance and cooperation of the parties who receive the APIs, and it would not prevent unauthorized access, modification or disclosure of the personal information by third parties or intermediaries who are not bound by the NDAs. Sharing only digitally signed APIs is not a sufficient method, as it would only ensure the authenticity and integrity of the APIs, but it would not prevent unauthorized access, modification or disclosure of the personal information by third parties or intermediaries who can read or intercept the APIs1, p. 90-91 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

The primary purpose of a privacy audit framework is to confirm and demonstrate effectiveness of the privacy program in achieving objectives and regulatory compliance. Historical breaches (B) and benchmarking (D) are by-products; maximizing staff effort (C) is about audit efficiency, not program assurance.

“Privacy audits validate the effectiveness and compliance of the privacy program.”

The vulnerability that would have the greatest impact on the privacy of information is private key exposure, because it would compromise the encryption and decryption of the information, as well as the authentication and integrity of the communicating parties. A private key is a secret and unique value that is used to encrypt or decrypt data, or to sign or verify digital signatures. If an attacker gains access to the private key, they can read, modify, or impersonate the data or the sender, which would violate the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of the information12.

The best way to address privacy concerns when an organization captures personal data from a third party through an open application programming interface (API) is to obtain consent from the data subjects. Consent is a freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes by which they agree to the processing of their personal data by the organization for a defined purpose. Consent is one of the legal bases for processing personal data under various privacy laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Obtaining consent from the data subjects can help ensure that they are aware of and agree to the collection and use of their personal data by the organization through the open API. Obtaining consent can also help respect the data subject’s rights and preferences regarding their personal data.

Developing a service level agreement (SLA) with the third party, implementing encryption for the data transmission, or reviewing the specification document of the open API are also good practices for addressing privacy concerns when using an open API to capture personal data from a third party, but they are not the best way. Developing an SLA with the third party can help define the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and obligations of both parties regarding the provision and use of the open API and the personal data involved. Implementing encryption for the data transmission can help protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the personal data transferred between the third party and the organization through the open API. Reviewing the specification document of the open API can help understand the functionality, features, parameters, or requirements of the open API and how it handles personal data.

When contracting with a SaaS provider, it is important to ensure that the provider will remove all customer data from their systems and storage devices at the end of the service contract. This will prevent any unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of the customer data by the provider or third parties after the service termination. Removal of customer data means that the data are permanently erased and cannot be recovered or restored by any means.

Privacy threat modeling is a methodology for identifying and mitigating privacy threats in a software architecture. It helps to ensure that privacy is considered in the design and development of software systems, and that privacy risks are minimized or eliminated. Privacy threat modeling typically involves the following steps: defining the scope and context of the system, identifying the data flows and data elements, identifying the privacy threats and their sources, assessing the impact and likelihood of the threats, and applying appropriate countermeasures to mitigate the threats. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 97

Data loss prevention (DLP) tools are technologies that help to prevent unauthorized access, use, or transfer of personal data. DLP tools can monitor, detect, and block data leakage or exfiltration from various sources, such as endpoints, networks, cloud services, or email. DLP tools can also enforce data protection policies and compliance requirements, such as encryption, masking, or deletion of sensitive data. DLP tools can help to protect personal data from both internal and external threats, such as malicious insiders, hackers, or accidental exposure.

Software hardening is a technique that mitigates design flaws in the application development process that may contribute to potential leakage of personal data. Software hardening is a process of modifying or configuring software to make it more secure and resilient against attacks or exploitation. Software hardening can involve various methods, such as removing unnecessary features or functions, disabling debugging or testing modes, applying patches or updates, implementing secure coding practices, etc. Software hardening helps to protect personal data by preventing or reducing the vulnerabilities that can allow unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or transfer of personal data. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 151

In GDPR parlance, organizations that use third-party service providers are often, but not always, considered data controllers, which are entities that determine the purposes and means of the processing of personal data, which can include directing third parties to process personal data on their behalf. The third parties that process data for data controllers are known as data processors.

The best way to protect personal data in the custody of a third party is to include requirements to comply with the organization’s privacy policies in the contract. This means that the organization should specify the terms and conditions of data processing, such as the purpose, scope, duration, and security measures, and ensure that they are consistent with the organization’s privacy policies and applicable privacy regulations. The contract should also define the roles and responsibilities of both parties, such as data controller and data processor, and establish mechanisms for monitoring, reporting, auditing, and resolving any issues or incidents related to data privacy. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 41

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are most valuable for illustrating the locations and movements of personal data across systems and processes, which is essential for compliance mapping and controls. Mapping at rest (C) or transit (D) are subsets of this broader view, while (A) is vague.

“DFDs identify where personal data resides and flows, supporting compliance and risk management.”

The first step for an IT privacy practitioner following a decision to expand remote working capability is to evaluate the impact resulting from this change on the organization’s privacy policies, programs and practices. This will help identify the risks and gaps that need to be addressed, as well as the opportunities for improvement and optimization. The other options are possible actions that may be taken after the impact assessment, depending on the results and recommendations.

Before an organization can respond to data subject access requests (DSARs), it needs to have a clear understanding of the data in its possession, such as what types of personal data are collected, where they are stored, how they are processed, who has access to them, and how long they are retained. This will help the organization to locate and retrieve the relevant data for each DSAR, and to ensure that the data are accurate, complete and up to date. Understanding the data in its possession will also help the organization to comply with other data protection principles and obligations, such as data minimization, purpose limitation, security and accountability.

The other options are less important or irrelevant to do first. Investing in a platform to automate data review may help to speed up the response process, but it does not guarantee that the organization has identified all the data sources and categories that are subject to DSARs. Confirming what is required for disclosure is also important, but it depends on the specific request and the applicable law or regulation. Creating a policy for handling access requests is a good practice, but it should be based on a thorough understanding of the data in its possession.

The first thing to do when a data collection process is deemed to be a high-level risk is to conduct a privacy impact assessment (PIA). A PIA is a systematic process that identifies and evaluates the potential effects of personal data processing operations on the privacy of individuals and the organization. A PIA helps to identify privacy risks and mitigation strategies at an early stage of the data collection process and ensures compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. A PIA also helps to demonstrate accountability and transparency to stakeholders and data subjects regarding how their personal data are collected, used, shared, stored, or deleted.

Performing a business impact analysis (BIA), implementing remediation actions to mitigate privacy risk, or creating a system of records notice (SORN) are also important steps for managing privacy risk, but they are not the first thing to do. Performing a BIA is a process of analyzing the potential impacts of disruptive events on the organization’s critical functions, processes, resources, or objectives. A BIA helps to determine the recovery priorities, strategies, and objectives for the organization in case of a disaster or crisis. Implementing remediation actions is a process of applying corrective or preventive measures to reduce or eliminate the privacy risks identified by the PIA or other methods. Remediation actions may include technical, organizational, or legal solutions, such as encryption, access control, consent management, or contractual clauses. Creating a SORN is a process of publishing a public notice that describes the existence and purpose of a system of records that contains personal data under the control of a federal agency. A SORN helps to inform the public about how their personal data are collected and maintained by the agency and what rights they have regarding their data.

Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) allow a party to prove possession of a secret or attribute without revealing the secret itself, enabling privacy-preserving verification. Digital signatures (A) and PGP (B) still involve exposure of certain data elements/keys for validation; passwordless methods (D) change authentication factors, not zero-knowledge verification.

“Zero-knowledge proofs enable verification without disclosure of the underlying data.”

The most important consideration for developing data retention requirements is the applicable regulations that govern the data. Different types of data may be subject to different legal and regulatory obligations, such as how long the data must be kept, how it must be protected, and how it can be accessed or disposed of. Failing to comply with these obligations can result in fines, penalties, lawsuits, or reputational damage for the organization. Therefore, it is essential to identify and follow the applicable regulations for each data category.

Synthetic data is generated artificially to mimic patterns without containing real personal data, making it the strongest method to embed privacy by design in AI training. De-identification (A) reduces but does not eliminate reidentification risk; consent (B) addresses lawfulness, not privacy-preserving training; privacy notices (D) provide transparency but not technical risk reduction.

“Synthetic data allows AI model training without exposing real personal information.”

Pseudonymization is a technique that replaces direct identifiers in a data set with pseudonyms or artificial identifiers that do not reveal the identity of the data subjects. Pseudonymization reduces the linkability of the data set with the original identity of the data subjects and thus enhances the privacy and security of the data. However, pseudonymization is not irreversible and the original identity can be re-established if the pseudonym or key is compromised. Therefore, it is important to keep the identifier separate and distinct from the data it protects and to apply additional security measures to safeguard the identifier. The other options are not relevant to pseudonymization1, p. 74-75 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Before using data from the organization’s customer database for a new marketing application, the first step should be to determine what data is required by the application and for what purpose. This will help to ensure that the data collection and processing are relevant, necessary, and proportionate to the intended use, and that the data minimization principle is followed. Data minimization means that only the minimum amount of personal data needed to achieve a specific purpose should be collected and processed, and that any excess or irrelevant data should be deleted or anonymized1. This will also help to comply with the data privacy laws and regulations that apply to the organization, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which require organizations to inform data subjects about the types and purposes of data processing, and to obtain their consent if needed23.

Data sanitization is a process of permanently erasing or destroying data from a storage device or media to prevent unauthorized access or recovery of the data. Data sanitization methods can include physical destruction, degaussing, overwriting, encryption or cryptographic erasure. The most important consideration when using advanced data sanitization methods to ensure privacy data will be unrecoverable is the type of media on which the data is stored, as different media types may require different methods or techniques to achieve effective sanitization. For example, physical destruction may be suitable for optical disks or tapes, but not for solid state drives (SSDs) or flash memory devices. Degaussing may be effective for magnetic disks or tapes, but not for optical disks or SSDs. Overwriting may work for hard disk drives (HDDs) or SSDs, but not for tapes or optical disks. Encryption or cryptographic erasure may be applicable for any media type, but may require additional security measures to protect the encryption keys or certificates. The other options are not as important as the type of media when using advanced data sanitization methods. Subject matter expertise may be helpful, but not essential, as long as the appropriate method is selected and applied correctly. Regulatory compliance requirements may influence the choice of method, but not necessarily determine it, as different methods may meet different standards or criteria. Location of data may affect the feasibility or cost of applying a method, but not its effectiveness or suitability., p. 93-94 References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Data retention is a process of keeping personal data for a specified period of time for legitimate purposes, such as legal obligations, contractual agreements, business operations or historical records. Data retention should be based on the principle of data minimization, which requires limiting the collection, storage and processing of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes. Data retention should also comply with the principle of storage limitation, which requires deleting or disposing of personal data when it is no longer needed or justified. The most likely valid use case for keeping a customer’s personal data after contract termination is a required retention period due to regulations, such as tax laws, financial laws, health laws or consumer protection laws, that mandate the organization to retain certain types of customer data for a certain period of time after the end of the contractual relationship. The other options are not valid use cases for keeping a customer’s personal data after contract termination, as they do not meet the criteria of necessity, relevance or justification. For the purpose of medical research, the organization would need to obtain the consent of the customer or have another legal basis for processing their personal data for a different purpose than the original contract. A forthcoming campaign to win back customers or ease of onboarding when the customer returns are not legitimate purposes for retaining customer data after contract termination, as they are not related to the original contract and may violate the customer’s privacy rights and preferences. , p. 99-100 References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

De-identification is a technique that removes or modifies direct and indirect identifiers in a data set to prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects. De-identification reduces the risk of re-identification and thus limits the organization’s potential exposure in the event of consumer data loss. De-identification also maintains the traceability of the data by preserving some characteristics or patterns of the original data that can be used for analysis or research purposes. The other options are not effective ways to limit exposure and maintain traceability1, p. 75-76 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Anonymization is a technique that removes or modifies all identifiers in a data set to prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects. Anonymization is an IT privacy practitioner’s best recommendation to reduce privacy risk before an organization provides personal data to a third party, as it would protect the privacy of the data subjects by reducing the linkability of the data set with their original identity, and also comply with the data minimization principle that requires limiting the collection, storage and processing of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes. Anonymization would also preserve some characteristics or patterns of the original data that can be used for analysis or research purposes by the third party, without compromising the accuracy or quality of the results. The other options are not as effective as anonymization in reducing privacy risk before an organization provides personal data to a third party. Tokenization is a technique that replaces sensitive or confidential data with non-sensitive tokens or placeholders that do not reveal the original data, but it does not prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects, as tokens can be reversed or linked back to the original data using a tokenization system or key. Aggregation is a technique that combines individual data into groups or categories that do not reveal the identity of the data subjects, but it may not prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects, as aggregated data can be de-aggregated or re-identified using other sources of information or techniques. Encryption is a technique that transforms plain text data into cipher text using an algorithm and a key, making it unreadable by unauthorized parties, but it does not prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects, as encrypted data can be decrypted or linked back to the original data using an encryption system or key1, p. 74-75 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

A data use policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for how personal data are collected, used, stored, shared and deleted by an organization. It is an important part of data governance and compliance, as it helps to ensure that personal data are handled in a lawful, fair and transparent manner, respecting the rights and preferences of data subjects. A data use policy should include the requirements for collecting and using personal data, such as the legal basis, the purpose, the scope, the consent, the data minimization, the accuracy, the security and the accountability. These requirements help to establish the legitimacy and necessity of data processing activities, and to prevent unauthorized or excessive use of personal data.

Implementing multi-factor authentication is the best way to reduce the risk of compromised credentials when an organization allows employees to have remote access, as it adds an extra layer of security and verification to the authentication process. Multi-factor authentication requires the user to provide two or more pieces of evidence to prove their identity, such as something they know (e.g., password, PIN), something they have (e.g., token, smart card), or something they are (e.g., fingerprint, face scan)135. References: 1 Domain 2, Task 8;

An audit log is a record of the activities and events that occur in an information system, such as an application hosting personal data. An audit log can help to monitor, detect, investigate and prevent unauthorized or malicious access, use, modification or deletion of personal data. An audit log can also help to demonstrate compliance with data protection laws and regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). An audit log should capture the following information for each event: 9

The date and time of the event

The identity of the user or system that performed the event

The type and description of the event

The outcome or result of the event

The personal data that were accessed, used, modified or deleted

The last user who accessed personal data is the most important information to capture in the audit log, as it can help to identify who is responsible for any data breach or misuse of personal data. It can also help to verify that only authorized and legitimate users have access to personal data, and that they follow the data use policy and the principle of least privilege. The last user who accessed personal data can also help to support data subjects’ rights, such as the right to access, rectify, erase or restrict their personal data.

The other options are less important or irrelevant to capture in the audit log of an application hosting personal data. Server details of the hosting environment are not related to personal data, and they can be obtained from other sources, such as network logs or configuration files. Last logins of privileged users are important to capture in a separate audit log for user account management, but they do not indicate what personal data were accessed or used by those users. Application error events are important to capture in a separate audit log for system performance and reliability, but they do not indicate what personal data were affected by those errors.

Compartmentalizing resource access is a security technique that divides a system or network into separate segments or zones with different levels of access and control, based on the sensitivity and value of the data or resources. Compartmentalizing resource access would most effectively reduce the impact of a successful breach through a remote access solution, as it would limit the scope and extent of the breach, and prevent unauthorized access to other segments or zones that contain more critical or sensitive data or resources. The other options are not as effective as compartmentalizing resource access in reducing the impact of a successful breach through a remote access solution. Regular testing of system backups is a security technique that verifies the availability and recoverability of data in case of a system failure or disaster, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data. Monitoring and reviewing remote access logs is a security technique that records and analyzes the activities and events related to remote access sessions, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data. Regular physical and remote testing of the incident response plan is a security technique that evaluates and improves the readiness and effectiveness of an organization’s response to security incidents, but it does not prevent or limit unauthorized access to data1, p. 91-92 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

The value proposition of a PIA is not understood by management is the greatest obstacle to conducting a PIA, as it may result in lack of support, funding, resources or commitment for the PIA process and outcomes. Management may not appreciate or recognize the benefits of a PIA, such as enhancing privacy protection, reducing privacy risks and costs, increasing customer trust and satisfaction, and complying with privacy laws and regulations. Management may also perceive a PIA as a burden, a delay or a hindrance to the system or project development and delivery. The other options are not as significant as the value proposition of a PIA is not understood by management as obstacles to conducting a PIA. Conducting a PIA requires significant funding and resources is an obstacle to conducting a PIA, but it may be overcome by demonstrating the return on investment or the cost-benefit analysis of a PIA. PIAs need to be performed many times in a year is an obstacle to conducting a PIA, but it may be mitigated by adopting a scalable or modular approach to PIAs that can be tailored to different types or levels of systems or projects. The organization lacks knowledge of PIA methodology is an obstacle to conducting a PIA, but it may be resolved by acquiring or developing the necessary skills, tools or guidance for performing PIAs1, p. 67-68 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

The best indication of a highly effective privacy training program is that members of the workforce understand their roles in protecting data privacy, because this shows that the training program has successfully raised the awareness and knowledge of the workforce on the importance, principles and practices of data privacy, and how they can contribute to the organization’s privacy objectives and compliance. According to ISACA, one of the key elements of a privacy training program is to define and communicate the roles and responsibilities of the workforce in relation to data privacy1. Members of the workforce who understand their roles in protecting data privacy are more likely to follow the privacy policies and procedures, report any privacy incidents or issues, and support the privacy culture of the organization2. Recent audits have no findings or recommendations related to data privacy, no privacy incidents have been reported in the last year, and HR has made privacy training an annual mandate for the organization are not as reliable as members of the workforce understand their roles in protecting data privacy, as they do not necessarily reflect the effectiveness of the privacy training program, but rather the performance of other factors such as audit processes, incident management systems, or HR policies.

Automated data discovery and classification tools provide continuous and systematic identification of data assets across the enterprise, ensuring accuracy and reducing manual errors. Internal updates (B) and departmental reporting (D) depend on human diligence; periodic manual audits (C) are time-bound and may miss changes between reviews.

“Automated discovery ensures a current and reliable data inventory, critical for privacy compliance.”

Data privacy standards are the set of rules, guidelines, and best practices that define the requirements and expectations for the collection, processing, storage, sharing, and disposal of personal data. Data privacy standards help to ensure that personal data is treated in a fair, lawful, transparent, and secure manner, as well as to comply with the applicable privacy laws and regulations. Data privacy standards also help to define the data retention time in a stream-fed data lake that includes personal data, as they specify the criteria and conditions for how long personal data can be kept in the data lake, based on factors such as the purpose, necessity, relevance, and quality of the data. Data retention time is an important aspect of data privacy, as it affects the risk of data breaches, unauthorized access, or misuse of personal data.

The best way for an organization to maintain the effectiveness of its privacy breach incident response plan is to conduct annual data privacy tabletop exercises. A data privacy tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the organization’s ability to respond to a privacy breach incident, such as a data breach, leak, or misuse. A data privacy tabletop exercise involves key stakeholders, such as the privacy office, the information security team, the legal counsel, the public relations team, etc., who role-play their actions and decisions based on the scenario. A data privacy tabletop exercise helps to evaluate and improve the organization’s privacy breach incident response plan, such as identifying gaps or weaknesses, validating roles and responsibilities, verifying procedures and protocols, assessing communication and coordination, etc. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 83

The organization should disclose the relationship to those affected in jurisdictions where such disclosures are required, as this is the most appropriate and compliant action to take after identifying a privacy risk related to third-party data collection. Disclosing the relationship to the data subjects is a way of providing transparency and accountability, as well as respecting their rights and choices regarding their personal data. It also helps the organization avoid regulatory fines or sanctions for not complying with the applicable privacy laws or regulations that mandate such disclosures. The other options are not as effective or sufficient as disclosing the relationship, as they do not address the root cause of the risk, do not mitigate the potential harm to the data subjects, or do not align with the privacy principles and best practices.

A data dictionary is a document that defines and describes the data elements, attributes, formats, sources, destinations, purposes and relationships of a data set or system. A data dictionary would be the best way to ensure personal data usage is standardized across the entire organization, as it would provide a common and consistent understanding and reference for how personal data is collected, used, disclosed and transferred within and outside the organization. A data dictionary would also help to ensure compliance with privacy principles, such as accuracy, transparency and accountability. The other options are not as effective as developing a data dictionary in ensuring personal data usage is standardized across the entire organization. De-identify all data is a technique that removes or modifies direct and indirect identifiers in a data set to prevent or limit the identification of the data subjects, but it does not ensure standardization or consistency of personal data usage across the organization. Encrypt all sensitive data is a technique that transforms plain text data into cipher text using an algorithm and a key, making it unreadable by unauthorized parties, but it does not ensure standardization or consistency of personal data usage across the organization. Perform data discovery is a process of identifying and locating personal data within an organization’s systems, databases, applications or files, but it does not ensure standardization or consistency of personal data usage across the organization1, p. 69-70 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

A thin client remote desktop protocol (RDP) is the most effective remote access model for reducing the likelihood of attacks originating from connecting devices, because it minimizes the amount of data and processing that occurs on the remote device. A thin client RDP only sends keyboard, mouse and display information between the remote device and the server, while the actual processing and storage of data happens on the server. This reduces the exposure of sensitive data and applications to potential attackers who may compromise the remote device.

Differential privacy provides mathematically provable protection against re-identification and linkage, adding calibrated noise to outputs so individuals cannot be singled out or linked. Pseudonymization (C) and masking (D) reduce direct identifiers but remain vulnerable to linkage attacks. Secure multiparty computation (B) protects computation among parties, not release-time linkability.

“Differential privacy limits what can be learned about any individual from query results, resisting re-identification/linkage.”

Awareness campaigns are initiatives that aim to educate and inform employees about the importance of privacy protection, the organization’s privacy policies and procedures, the applicable laws and regulations, and the best practices and behaviors to safeguard personal data. Awareness campaigns can support an organization’s efforts to create and maintain desired privacy protection practices among employees by raising their awareness, understanding and commitment to privacy, as well as by influencing their attitudes, values and culture. Awareness campaigns can use various methods and channels, such as posters, newsletters, videos, webinars, quizzes, games or events, to deliver consistent and engaging messages to the target audience. The other options are not the best ways to support an organization’s efforts to create and maintain desired privacy protection practices among employees. Skills training programs are focused on developing specific technical or functional skills related to privacy, but they may not address the broader aspects of privacy awareness or culture. Performance evaluations are focused on measuring and rewarding individual or team performance based on predefined criteria or objectives, but they may not reflect the actual level of privacy awareness or practice. Code of conduct principles are focused on establishing and enforcing ethical standards and rules of behavior for employees, but they may not be sufficient to create or maintain privacy awareness or practice without effective communication and education1, p. 103-104 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

A raw zone is a zone within a data lake that contains unprocessed or unstructured data that is ingested from various sources without any transformation or validation. A raw zone may contain sensitive data that has not been identified or classified yet, such as personal data. Therefore, sensitive data in a raw zone should be encrypted or tokenized to protect its confidentiality and integrity. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable form using a secret key or algorithm. Tokenization is a process of replacing sensitive data with non-sensitive substitutes called tokens. Both encryption and tokenization help to prevent unauthorized or unlawful access, use, disclosure, or transfer of sensitive data in a raw zone. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 169

The best way to validate that privacy practices align to the published enterprise privacy management program is to conduct an audit. An audit is an independent and objective examination of evidence to provide assurance that privacy practices are effective and compliant with the enterprise privacy management program. An audit can also identify any gaps or weaknesses in the privacy practices and provide recommendations for improvement. An audit can be conducted internally or externally, depending on the scope, objectives, and standards of the audit. References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version), page 83

Data mapping is the process of defining how data elements from different sources are related, transformed, and transferred to a common destination. Data mapping is the first step when developing an application link because it helps to ensure that the data exchanged between the API and the third-party application is consistent, accurate, and compatible. Data mapping also helps to identify any gaps, errors, or conflicts in the data and resolve them before the data transfer occurs.

The principle of least privilege is the most important principle to apply when granting access to an ERP system that contains a significant amount of personal data. The principle of least privilege states that users should only have the minimum level of access and permissions necessary to perform their legitimate tasks and functions, and no more. Applying the principle of least privilege helps to protect the privacy and security of the personal data in the ERP system, as it reduces the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate access, disclosure, modification, or deletion of the data. It also helps to comply with the privacy laws and regulations, such as the GDPR, that require data controllers and processors to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk.

Height, weight, and activities are the most legitimate information to collect for business reasons in this situation, as they are directly related to the purpose and functionality of a wellness smartwatch application that aims to monitor and improve the health and fitness of its users. Collecting height, weight, and activities would also comply with the data minimization principle that requires limiting the collection, storage and processing of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes. The other options are not legitimate information to collect for business reasons in this situation, as they are not related to the purpose and functionality of a wellness smartwatch application and may violate the privacy rights and preferences of its users. Collecting sleep schedule and calorie intake may be useful for some users who want to track their sleep quality and nutrition intake, but they are not essential for a wellness smartwatch application and may require additional consent or justification from the users. Collecting education and profession may be irrelevant for a wellness smartwatch application and may be used for other purposes, such as marketing or profiling, without the consent or knowledge of the users. Collecting race, age, and gender may be sensitive for some users who do not want to disclose their personal characteristics or identity, and may require additional safeguards or measures to protect their privacy1, p. 75-76 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

A privacy notice is a document that informs data subjects about how their personal data is collected, processed, stored, shared, and protected by an organization. The primary purpose of a privacy notice is to provide transparency to the data subject on the intended use of their personal data, as well as their rights and choices regarding their data. A privacy notice also helps the organization comply with legal and regulatory requirements, such as obtaining consent, demonstrating accountability, and fulfilling the principle of fairness and lawfulness.

System hardening is a process of applying security measures and configurations to a system to reduce its attack surface and enhance its resistance to threats. System hardening can include disabling unnecessary services, removing default accounts, applying patches and updates, enforcing strong passwords and encryption, and implementing firewalls and antivirus software. The primary benefit of system hardening is that it increases system resiliency, which is the ability of a system to withstand or recover from adverse events that could affect its functionality or performance. The other options are not the primary benefits of system hardening, although they may be secondary benefits or outcomes. System hardening does not necessarily reduce external threats to data, as threats can originate from various sources and vectors. System hardening may reduce exposure of data, but only if the data is stored or processed by the system. System hardening does not eliminate attack motivation for data, as attackers may have different motives and incentives for targeting data. , p. 91-92 References: : CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Code review is a primary element of application and software hardening. Code review is a process of examining the source code of an application or software to identify and fix errors, vulnerabilities, or inefficiencies that may compromise its functionality, security, or performance. Code review can help prevent common security risks such as buffer overflows, SQL injections, cross-site scripting, or logic flaws. Code review can also help improve the quality, readability, maintainability, and usability of the code. Code review can be done manually by developers or peers, or automatically by tools such as static code analyzers or code quality checkers.

Vulnerability analysis, database configuration, and software repository are also important for application and software hardening, but they are not primary elements. Vulnerability analysis is a process of identifying and assessing the weaknesses or flaws in an application or software that may expose it to attacks or exploitation. Vulnerability analysis can be done by tools such as vulnerability scanners or penetration testers. Database configuration is a process of setting up and managing the parameters, options, or features of a database system that stores or processes data for an application or software. Database configuration can include aspects such as access control, encryption, backup, recovery, performance tuning, or replication. Software repository is a location where the source code, binaries, or documentation of an application or software are stored and managed. Software repository can facilitate version control, collaboration, distribution, or deployment of the application or software.

The best way for an organization to maintain the effectiveness of its privacy breach incident response plan is to conduct annual data privacy tabletop exercises. A tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the organization’s ability to respond to a privacy breach incident in a realistic and interactive way. A tabletop exercise can help the organization to evaluate the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team, identify the gaps and weaknesses in the plan, improve the communication and coordination among the stakeholders, and update the plan based on the lessons learned and best practices12. A tabletop exercise can also enhance the awareness and readiness of the organization to handle privacy breach incidents in a timely and effective manner3. References:

ISACA CDPSE Review Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2

ISACA Journal, Volume 4, 2019, “Tabletop Exercises: Three Sample Scenarios”

ISACA Journal, Volume 6, 2017, “Privacy Breach Response: Preparing for the Inevitable”

The best way to validate compliance with agreed-upon service levels established with a third party that processes personal data is to have a contractual right to audit, which means that the organization can conduct audits or inspections of the third party’s privacy practices, policies, and procedures to verify that they meet the contractual obligations and expectations. A contractual right to audit can also help identify and address any privacy risks or gaps that may arise from the third party’s processing of personal data12.

The use of personal data in model training is the primary privacy risk with LLMs, since once trained, models may retain, reproduce, or infer personal data without proper controls. Hallucinations (B), expertise shortages (C), and interoperability issues (D) are operational or performance risks, but not privacy risks.

“Training models on personal data can result in unintended retention, exposure, or disclosure of sensitive information.”

The best way to ensure an effective data privacy policy is implemented is to align regulatory requirements with business needs, because this will help achieve compliance while also supporting the organization’s objectives, values, and strategies. A data privacy policy should reflect the legal obligations and expectations of the organization, as well as the needs and preferences of its stakeholders, such as customers, employees, partners, and regulators. A data privacy policy should also be flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances and environments12.

To ensure the protection of personal data, privacy policies should mandate that access to information system applications be authorized by the business application owner, because they are the ones who are responsible for defining the business requirements, functions, and objectives of the applications. The business application owner can also determine the appropriate level of access for different users or groups based on their roles, responsibilities, and needs. The business application owner can also monitor and review the access control policies and procedures to ensure that they are effective and compliant with the privacy regulations and standards.

 Transparency is the most important attribute of a privacy policy because it informs the users about how their personal data is collected, used, shared, and protected by the organization. Transparency also helps to build trust and confidence with the users, and to comply with legal and ethical obligations regarding data privacy.

A private cloud is a cloud deployment model that provides exclusive access and control to a single organization or a specific group of users within the organization. A private cloud is best for an organization whose main objectives are to logically isolate personal data from other tenants and adopt custom privacy controls for the data, as it offers the highest level of security, privacy, and customization among the cloud deployment models. A private cloud allows the organization to implement its own privacy policies, standards, and procedures for the personal data, as well as to configure the cloud infrastructure, services, and applications according to its specific needs and preferences. A private cloud also reduces the risk of data breaches, unauthorized access, or co-mingling of data from other tenants, as the personal data is stored and processed in a dedicated and isolated environment.

A privacy audit is a systematic and independent examination of an organization’s privacy policies, procedures, practices, and controls to assess their compliance with applicable laws, regulations, standards, and best practices. A privacy audit may result in various outputs, such as findings, recommendations, observations, or opinions. Among the options given, the output that is most likely to trigger remedial action is the identification of deficiencies in how personal data is shared with third parties. This is because such deficiencies may pose significant risks to the privacy and security of the data subjects, as well as to the reputation and legal liability of the organization. Remedial action may include implementing contractual safeguards, technical measures, or organizational changes to ensure that third parties respect and protect the personal data they receive from the organization.

The best way to ensure that application hardening is included throughout the software development life cycle (SDLC) is to include qualified application security personnel as part of the process. Application hardening is the process of applying security measures and techniques to an application to reduce its attack surface, vulnerabilities, and risks. Application hardening should be integrated into every stage of the SDLC, from planning and design to development and testing to deployment and maintenance. Including qualified application security personnel as part of the process helps to ensure that application hardening is performed effectively and consistently, as well as to provide guidance, feedback, and support to the developers, testers, and project managers. The other options are not as effective or sufficient as including qualified application security personnel as part of the process, as they do not address the root cause of the lack of application hardening, which is the gap in skills and knowledge among the SDLC participants.