Cloud Security Alliance CCZT Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) Exam Practice Test

The scope of the target state definition in Zero Trust planning is significantly influenced by an organization's risk appetite. This entails a strategic evaluation of the level of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. Continuous authentication and authorization, integral to Zero Trust, adapt to the dynamic state of threats and the organization's risk posture, ensuring that authorization decisions align with the prevailing risk appetite and the changing security landscape​​.

In a Zero Trust Architecture, the Policy Decision Point (PDP) is the primary entity responsible for crafting and maintaining policies, especially those that enforce the principle of least privilege for network access. The PDP evaluates all relevant information about an access request—including the identity of the requester, the context of the request, and the requested resource—and makes a decision on whether to grant or deny access based on predefined policies. This process ensures that access rights are strictly aligned with the necessity of the role and the minimum access required to perform a function, thereby adhering to the principle of least privilege​​.

A critical product of the gap analysis process is the implementation’s requirements, which are the specifications and criteria that define the desired outcomes, capabilities, and functionalities of the ZTA. The implementation’s requirements are derived from the gap analysis, which identifies the current state, the target state, and the gaps between them. The implementation’s requirements help to guide the design, development, testing, and deployment of the ZTA, as well as the evaluation of its effectiveness and alignment with the business objectives and needs.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Scope, Priority, & Business Case”
• The Zero Trust Journey: 4 Phases of Implementation - SEI Blog, section “Second Phase: Assess”
• Planning for a Zero Trust Architecture: A Planning Guide for Federal …, section “Gap Analysis”

To respond quickly to changes while implementing ZT Strategy, an organization requires a mindset and culture of continuous risk evaluation and policy adjustment. This means that the organization should constantly monitor the threat landscape, assess the security posture, and update the policies and controls accordingly to maintain a high level of protection and resilience. The organization should also embrace feedback, learning, and improvement as part of the ZT journey.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 7, section 1.3
• Cultivating a Zero Trust mindset - AWS Prescriptive Guidance, section “Continuous learning and improvement”
• Zero Trust architecture: a paradigm shift in cybersecurity - PwC, section “Continuous monitoring and improvement”

Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) features such as server isolation, single packet authorization (SPA), and dynamic drop-all firewalls are designed to protect against a range of threats, including Denial of Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. These SDP capabilities help to shield servers from unwanted or malicious traffic by ensuring that only authenticated and authorized users can establish connections. By minimizing the server's exposure to the internet and reducing its attack surface, SDP effectively mitigates the risk of DoS/DDoS attacks, which aim to overwhelm servers with excessive traffic, thereby ensuring the availability and reliability of critical services within a Zero Trust framework.

Data sources are the ZT element that provide information that providers can use to keep policies dynamically updated. Data sources are the inputs that feed the policy engine and the policy administrator with the relevant data and context about the entities, resources, transactions, and environment in the ZTA. Data sources help to inform the policy decisions and actions based on the current state and conditions of the ZTA. Data sources can include identity providers, device management systems, threat intelligence feeds, network monitoring tools, etc.

References = Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) - Cloud Security Alliance, Zero Trust Training (ZTT) - Module 3: ZTA Architecture and Components

Single Packet Authorization (SPA) is a method used in Zero Trust networks to securely request access to a service. A key concept of SPA is that the SPA packet must be self-contained, carrying all necessary information for the authorization decision within a single, encrypted packet. This ensures that the packet alone can provide enough context for the receiving server to authenticate the request and make an authorization decision, without needing additional information exchanges. This self-contained nature of SPA packets aligns with the principle of minimizing the movement and exposure of sensitive credentials, thus enhancing the security of the authentication process​​.

ZTA uses micro-segmentation to divide the network into smaller, isolated segments that can prevent unauthorized access and contain lateral movement. ZTA also uses encryption to protect data in transit and at rest from eavesdropping and tampering.

Business continuity and disaster recovery are the activities of the ZT implementation preparation phase that ensure the resiliency of the organization’s operations in the event of disruption. Business continuity refers to the process of maintaining or restoring the essential functions of the organization during and after a crisis, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a pandemic. Disaster recovery refers to the process of recovering the IT systems, data, and infrastructure that support the business continuity. ZT implementation requires planning and testing the business continuity and disaster recovery strategies and procedures, as well as aligning them with the ZT policies and controls.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Monitor & Measure”
• Zero Trust architecture: a paradigm shift in cybersecurity - PwC, section “Continuous monitoring and improvement”
• Zero Trust Implementation, section “Outline Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) implementation steps”

A common activity in the scope, priority, and business case steps of ZT planning is to determine the organization’s current state. This involves assessing the existing security posture, architecture, policies, processes, and capabilities of the organization, as well as identifying the key stakeholders, business drivers, and goals for the ZT initiative. Determining the current state helps to establish a baseline, identify gaps and risks, and define the scope and priority of the ZT transformation.

References =

• Zero Trust Planning - Cloud Security Alliance, section “Scope, Priority, & Business Case”
• The Zero Trust Journey: 4 Phases of Implementation - SEI Blog, section “First Phase: Prepare”

To ensure an acceptable user experience when implementing SDP, a security architect should collaborate with IT to model and plan the user experience, client software distribution, and device onboarding processes. This is because SDP requires users to install and use client software to access the protected resources, and the user experience may vary depending on the device type, operating system, network conditions, and security policies. By modeling and planning the user experience, the security architect and IT can ensure that the SDP implementation is user-friendly, consistent, and secure.

References = Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) - Cloud Security Alliance, Zero Trust Training (ZTT) - Module 7: Network Infrastructure and SDP

SOAR is a collection of software programs developed to bolster an organization’s cybersecurity posture. SOAR tools can automate the response to security events and incidents by executing predefined workflows or playbooks, which can include tasks such as alert triage, threat detection, containment, mitigation, and remediation. SOAR tools can also orchestrate the integration of various security tools and data sources, and provide centralized dashboards and reporting for security operations.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 23, section 3.2.2
• Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) - Gartner
• Security Automation: Tools, Process and Best Practices - Cynet, section “What are the different types of security automation tools?”
• Introduction to automation in Microsoft Sentinel

A comprehensive catalogue of all transactions, dependencies, and services with associated IDs is a potential outcome of an effective ZT implementation because it helps to map the data flows and interactions among the assets and entities in the ZTA. This catalogue enables the ZTA to enforce granular and dynamic policies based on the context and attributes of the transactions, dependencies, and services. It also facilitates the monitoring and auditing of the ZTA activities and performance.

References = Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) - Cloud Security Alliance, Zero Trust Training (ZTT) - Module 3: ZTA Architecture and Components

The policy engine (PE) is the component in a ZTA that is responsible for deciding whether to grant access to a resource. The PE evaluates the policies and the contextual data collected from various sources, such as the user identity, the device posture, the network location, the resource attributes, and the environmental factors, and then generates an access decision. The PE communicates the access decision to the policy enforcement point (PEP), which enforces the decision on the resource.

References =

• Certificate of Competence in Zero Trust (CCZT) prepkit, page 14, section 2.2.2
• What Is Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)? - F5, section “Policy Engine”
• What is Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)? | NextLabs, section “Core Components”
• [SP 800-207, Zero Trust Architecture], page 11, section 3.3.1

SDP mitigates the risk of broken access control by mandating micro-segmentation and implementing least privilege. Micro-segmentation divides the network into smaller, isolated segments that can prevent unauthorized access and contain lateral movement. Least privilege grants the minimum necessary access to users and devices for specific resources, while hiding all other assets from their view. This reduces the attack surface and prevents attackers from exploiting weak or misconfigured access controls

In a ZTA, automation and orchestration can increase security by using the following means:

• Infrastructure as code (laC): laC is a practice of managing and provisioning IT infrastructure through code, rather than manual processes or configuration tools1. laC can increase security by enabling consistent, repeatable, and scalable deployment of ZTA components, such as policies, gateways, firewalls, and micro-segments2. laC can also facilitate compliance, auditability, and change management, as well as reduce human errors and configuration drifts3.
• Identity lifecycle management: Identity lifecycle management is a process of managing the creation, modification, and deletion of user identities and their access rights throughout their lifecycle4. Identity lifecycle management can increase security by ensuring that users have the appropriate level of access to resources at any given time, based on the principle of least privilege5. Identity lifecycle management can also automate the provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts, enforce strong authentication and authorization policies, and monitor and audit user activity and behavior6.

References =

• What is Infrastructure as Code? | Cloudflare
• Zero Trust Architecture: Infrastructure as Code
• Infrastructure as Code: Security Best Practices
• What is Identity Lifecycle Management? | One Identity
• Zero Trust Architecture: Identity and Access Management
• Identity Lifecycle Management: A Zero Trust Security Strategy

In a ZTA, a policy decision point (PDP) is a logical component that evaluates the incoming signals from an entity requesting access to a resource against a set of access determination criteria, such as identity, context, device, location, and behavior1. A PDP then makes a decision to grant or deny access, or to request additional information or verification, based on the policies defined by the policy administrator1. A policy enforcement point (PEP) is a logical component that uses the incoming signals from the PDP to open or close a connection between the entity and the resource1. A PEP acts as a gateway or intermediary that enforces the decision made by the PDP and prevents unauthorized or risky access2.

References =

• Zero Trust Architecture | NIST
• Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) - Pomerium

SDP features, like multi-factor authentication (MFA), mutual transport layer security (mTLS), and device fingerprinting, protect against phishing attacks by verifying the identity and authenticity of both the user and the device before granting access to a resource. Phishing attacks are attempts to trick users into revealing their credentials or other sensitive information by impersonating a legitimate entity or service1. SDP features can prevent phishing attacks by:

• MFA: MFA is a security mechanism that requires a user to provide more than one piece of evidence to prove their identity, such as a password, a one-time code, a biometric factor, or a physical token2. MFA can protect against phishing attacks by making it harder for attackers to access a resource even if they manage to obtain the user’s password or other credentials2.
• mTLS: mTLS is a security protocol that enables mutual authentication and encryption between two parties, such as a client and a server3. mTLS can protect against phishing attacks by ensuring that both the client and the server have valid and trusted certificates, and by preventing attackers from intercepting or modifying the communication between them3.
• Device fingerprinting: Device fingerprinting is a technique that identifies and verifies a device based on its unique characteristics, such as its operating system, browser, IP address, or hardware configuration4. Device fingerprinting can protect against phishing attacks by allowing only authorized devices to access a resource, and by detecting any anomalies or changes in the device’s attributes that may indicate a compromise4.

References =

• What is Phishing? | How to Identify & Prevent Phishing Attacks | Cloudflare
• What is Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)? | Cloudflare
• What is Mutual TLS (mTLS)? | Cloudflare
• What is Device Fingerprinting? | Cloudflare