APSE CESP Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) Exam Practice Test

The BEST solution to resolve this problem is to request a noise-canceling headset from the employer. This would help the employee to focus on the callers and block out the distracting sounds around her. It would also be a low-cost and reasonable accommodation that the employer could provide. The other options are not as effective or feasible because:

• A. Referring her to vocational rehabilitation would not address the immediate issue of noise in the workplace. It would also imply that she needs to change her career or find a different job, which may not be her preference or goal.
• B. Referring her to occupational therapy for further evaluations would also not address the immediate issue of noise in the workplace. It would also involve additional costs and time for the employee and the employer, and may not result in any useful recommendations or solutions.
• D. Moving her to an office away from her co-workers would not be a low-cost solution, as it would require rearranging the office space and possibly affecting the productivity and morale of other employees. It would also isolate her from her team and reduce her opportunities for social interaction and support. References:
• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.1: Identify and implement accommodations and supports to meet the needs of the individual and employer, Knowledge of 4.1.1: Types of accommodations and supports
• CESP- ASPE Flashcards, card 67, Reasonable Accommodation, Definition: Any change or adjustment to a job or work environment that permits a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the job application process, to perform the essential functions of a job, or to enjoy benefits and privileges of employment equal to those enjoyed by employees without disabilities.

The least appropriate item to include in his portfolio is a brief guide to working with someone who has autism. This option does not showcase the job-seeker’s skills, abilities, or achievements in construction. It also may create a negative impression of the job-seeker as someone who needs special treatment or accommodation, rather than someone who can add value to the employer. This option does not align with the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, empowerment, and dignity.

The other options are more appropriate than option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Testimonials from people who have previously contracted the services of the job-seeker are a good way to demonstrate the job-seeker’s reputation, quality of work, and customer satisfaction. They can also provide evidence of the job-seeker’s communication skills, reliability, and professionalism. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as career development, quality outcomes, and respect.
• Option C: Pictures of the job-seeker’s completed projects are a great way to showcase the job-seeker’s skills, abilities, and achievements in construction. They can also illustrate the job-seeker’s creativity, diversity, and expertise in different types of projects. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, career development, and quality outcomes.
• Option D: A list of references from people for whom the job-seeker has worked is a useful way to provide contact information for potential employers to verify the job-seeker’s work history, performance, and character. They can also provide additional information or feedback on the job-seeker’s strengths, interests, and needs. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as career development, quality outcomes, and respect.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

 The LEAST appropriate way to proceed is to coach her how to quit the job in a professional manner. This would imply that she is not capable of working in that environment and that there are no other options to help her succeed. It would also undermine her self-confidence and career goals. A better approach would be to explore the possible accommodations and supports that could make her job more manageable and enjoyable. You could also visit her office and identify how she can create more order in her workload, such as prioritizing tasks, using a planner, or delegating responsibilities. You could also talk to her support team about ways to cope with her anxiety, such as relaxation techniques, counseling, or medication. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.1: Identify and implement accommodations and supports to meet the needs of the individual and employer, Knowledge of 4.1.1: Types of accommodations and supports
• CESP Practice Exam, question 2, answer C: The job seeker’s strengths, interests, needs and conditions for employment.

The APSE ethical guidelines are a set of principles and practices that professionals in supported employment should follow to promote services consistent with human dignity1. One of the core values of APSE is that employment should be an option for any person interested in working, regardless of label, support need, or perceived functioning level1. Therefore, the statement that individuals with severe disabilities are unemployable is NOT an APSE ethical guideline, but rathera misconception that contradicts the APSE vision of inclusive communities where everyone works2. References: 1: APSE Ethical Guidelines for Professionals in Supported Employment 2: APSE Mission and Vision Statement

According to the Social Security Administration1, the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program provides monthly payments to people who have limited income and resources, and who are either 65 or older, blind, or have a disability. The eligibility for SSI is not based on the parent’s Social Security earnings, but on the individual’s own income and resources. The parent’s earnings may affect the SSI eligibility of a child under 18, but not of an adult2. Therefore, option A does not define the SSI program.

The other options are correct definitions of the SSI program. Option B states that qualifying for SSI is based upon earned income and owned assets, which is true. The SSI program has strict limits on how much income and resources a person can have to be eligible1. Option C states that the basic SSI amount is the same nationwide, but many states add money to the basic benefit, which is also true. The federal SSI benefit rate for 2024 is $794 per month for an individual and $1,191 per month for a couple, but some states supplement this amount with their own funds3. Option D states that the program makes payments to people with low income who are age 65 or older or have a disability, which is the main purpose of the SSI program1. References: 1: Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 2: You May Be Able to Get Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 3: SSI Federal Payment Amounts For 2024

it aligns with the core values and principles of employment support professionals, such as respecting the right to work, promoting self-determination and empowerment, and providing community-based services. Orienting the job seeker to employment support services would help him understand the process and expectations, as well as build rapport and trust with the employment support professional.

Answer B is not correct, because it implies that the job seeker needs to meet certain criteria or have his symptoms under control before he can pursue employment, which goes against the principle of zero exclusion. Asking him to have his therapist verify his symptoms could also undermine his confidence and motivation.

Answer C is not correct, because it does not address the job seeker’s immediate needs and goals, and it could delay the engagement in the employment process. Accessing his file could be useful later on, but it should not be the first step.

Answer D is not correct, because it suggests that the employment support professional does not believe in the job seeker’s abilities and potential, and that he needs external validation from others. This could also violate the job seeker’s privacy and dignity, anddiscourage him from pursuing his employment goals. References: https://apse.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CESP-Practice-Exam-8-2.pdf

https://cesp.helpscoutdocs.com/article/637-cesp-examination-content-outline

The primary role of an employment support professional (ESP) on the job site is to assist the individual with a disability to find and maintain competitive employment in integrated community workplaces1. This involves building capacity within the workplace to provide training and support for the individual, providing one-to-one training and support as well as a fade-out plan, and helping the employee learn about the work culture2. However, guaranteeing that the job gets done is not the responsibility of the ESP, but rather the employer and the employee. The ESP should not take over the employee’s tasks or interfere with the employer’s expectations, but rather facilitate the natural supports and accommodations that enable the employee to perform the job independently and satisfactorily3. References: 1: CESP™ -Association of People Supporting Employment First 2: Supporting Individuals with Significant Disabilities: The Roles of a Job Coach 3: Job Description - Employment Support Worker - Voscur

Motivational interviewing is a counseling approach that helps people find the motivation to make positive behavior changes. It is based on the use of a guiding style that is collaborative, evocative, and honors client autonomy1. Asking open-ended questions is one of the core skills of motivational interviewing, as it encourages the client to elaborate and dive deeper into their own reasons and goals for change2. Open-ended questions also demonstrate interest and respect for the client’s perspective, and avoid imposing the counselor’s agenda or opinions3.

The other options are not the best descriptions of the motivational interviewing technique. Option B, inquiring about barriers to employment, may be relevant for some clients, but it is not specific to motivational interviewing. It may also focus too much on the negative aspects of the client’s situation, rather than eliciting their strengths and resources. Option C, encouraging the support person to answer, may violate the client’s autonomy and privacy, and may undermine the collaborative relationship between the counselor and the client. Option D, focusing on the person’s medical needs, may also be important for some clients, but it is not the main focus of motivational interviewing. It may also neglect the client’s psychological, social, and emotional needs, and may not address the client’s ambivalence or readiness for change. References: 1: Motivational Interviewing: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy 2: 7 Motivational Interviewing Techniques For Professionals 3: Motivational interviewing | The BMJ

 Motivational interviewing is a collaborative, goal-oriented method of communication that aims to enhance the individual’s intrinsic motivation to change1. It is based on four principles: expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy2. Motivational interviewing does not involve deferring to the vocational rehabilitation counselor for decision making, as this would undermine the individual’s autonomy and self-determination. Rather, motivational interviewing respects the individual’s perspective and preferences, and helps them explore and resolve their own ambivalence to change3. References:

• Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, Chapter 1
• Motivational Interviewing in Employment Services, page 4
• APSE CESP Study Guide, page 18, Section 2.2.1

The core pre-employment transition requirement that is met when teaching a student about disclosing a disability is self-advocacy. Self-advocacy is one of the five required activities that VRagencies must provide to students with disabilities under the WIOA regulations. Self-advocacy includes instruction in self-awareness, disability disclosure, requesting accommodations, understanding rights and responsibilities, and self-determination. Teaching a student about disclosing a disability helps them to make informed choices about whether, when, how, and to whom to disclose their disability, and to understand the potential benefits and consequences of doing so. Disclosing a disability is a personal decision that may affect the student’s access to services, supports, and opportunities in education, employment, and other settings. References: RSA Frequently-Asked Questions about Pre-Employment Transition Services, Pre-Employment Transition Services (Pre-ETS): The Five Required Activities for Students with Disabilities, Disclosing a Disability to an Employer: Your Rights, Disclosing an invisible disability

According to the APSE website, school-to-work eligibility requirements are based on the following factors1:

• The student must be enrolled in a school district or an approved private school.
• The student must have an Individualized Education Program (IEP) or a 504 Plan that includes transition services and goals.
• The student must be at least 14 years old and not older than 21 years old.
• The student must have a desire to work and a commitment to participate in the program. Therefore, the option C, work history, is not a factor in meeting school-to-work eligibility requirements. The other options are factors that are considered for the program. References:
• School-to-Work Transition

The first consideration when deciding whether to pursue an interview for a job-seeker who has a physical disability and uses a wheelchair is ensuring that the office where the meeting is held is wheelchair accessible. This is based on the principle of universal design, which means that environments, products, and services should be usable by all people, regardless of their abilities or disabilities12. Ensuring accessibility is not only a legal requirement under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), but also a way to promote inclusion and respect for the job-seeker3. The other options (A, B, and C) are important factors to consider, but they are not the first consideration. The job-seeker’s interests, capabilities, and transportation needs should be assessed and addressed before the job development stage, as part of the individualizedemployment and career planning process. References: 1: Universal Design - Association of People Supporting Employment First 2: What is Universal Design? | Centre for Excellence in Universal Design 3: ADA Requirements: Wheelchair Ramps : CESP study guide Flashcards |

 The least effective photo setting to use in promoting employment services to employers is chatting with her roommates in her group home. This option does not demonstrate the woman’s skills, abilities, or contributions to the workforce. It also reinforces the stereotype that people with disabilities are dependent, isolated, or segregated from the community. This option does not align with the core values and principles of employment support, such as inclusion, empowerment, and dignity.

The other options are more effective than option B, for the following reasons:

• Option A: Having lunch with co-workers in a company cafeteria shows that the woman is integrated, accepted, and valued by her peers. It also suggests that she has good social skills, communication skills, and teamwork skills. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as inclusion, natural supports, and respect.
• Option C: Standing with an attractive, alert expression on her face shows that the woman is confident, professional, and enthusiastic. It also creates a positive impression of her personality, attitude, and appearance. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as empowerment, self-determination, and dignity.
• Option D: Working in a corporate office shows that the woman is capable, productive, and qualified. It also indicates that she has relevant skills, knowledge, and experience for the job. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, career development, and quality outcomes.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

 When presenting your employment services to the local Chamber of Commerce, you should focus on the value proposition of hiring the individuals you represent, rather than their disabilities. Providing definitions or explanations of the disabilities of the job seekers you represent may create stereotypes, stigma, or pity, which are not conducive to building trust and respect with potential employers. Instead, you should highlight the consumer base and buying power of people with disabilities, the benefits of hiring the individuals you represent (such as skills, diversity, loyalty, etc.), and the tax incentives or other value-added benefits for businesses (such as reduced turnover, increased productivity, etc.). 

Motivational interviewing is a client-centered, directive method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence1. It is based on the principles of collaboration, evocation, and autonomy2. The best question to ask using motivational interviewing techniques is one that reflects these principles and helps the client to examine their own reasons and consequences for their behavior. Therefore, the option C, “Can you help me understand your decision to steal candy?” is the best question to ask, as it invites the client to share their perspective without judgment, expresses curiosity and empathy, and allows the client to have autonomy over their choices. The other options are not consistent with motivational interviewing techniques because:

• A. “What do you think will happen if you get caught by the manager?” is a question that focuses on the external consequences of the behavior, rather than the internal motivation to change. It may also imply a threat or a warning, which could increase the client’s resistance or defensiveness.
• B. “If you get caught you can be prosecuted; are you going to keep stealing?” is a question that confronts the client with a negative outcome and a closed-ended question that limits the client’s response. It may also elicit a negative reaction from the client, such as denial, rationalization, or hostility.
• D. “That was not very smart; what made you think that was a good idea?” is a question that criticizes the client’s intelligence and judgment, and implies that the counselor knows better than the client. It may also damage the rapport and trust between the counselor and the client, and make the client feel ashamed or angry. References:
• Motivational Interviewing
• Motivational Interviewing: Definition, Techniques, and Efficacy

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports covers the following tasks:

• 4.1 Assist individuals to understand their rights and responsibilities related to employment, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and other relevant laws and policies.
• 4.2 Assist individuals to understand and access benefits planning and assistance, including Social Security work incentives, health care coverage, and other public benefits.
• 4.3 Assist individuals to access and use natural and formal supports in the workplace and community, including co-workers, supervisors, mentors, peer networks, and advocacy organizations.
• 4.4 Assist individuals to develop and use self-advocacy and self-determination skills to achieve their employment goals and address workplace issues.
• 4.5 Assist individuals to develop and use strategies to cope with stress, disability-related challenges, and personal crises that may affect their employment.
• 4.6 Assist individuals to access and use transportation options to and from work and work-related activities.
• 4.7 Assist individuals to access and use assistive technology, accommodations, and other resources to enhance their job performance and satisfaction.
• 4.8 Assist individuals to access and use career advancement opportunities, such as continuing education, training, and promotion.

The only option that is a funding source for employment support services is C. Ticket to Work (OTW). The Ticket to Work program is a voluntary program that helps Social Security disability beneficiaries find and keep employment, increase their earnings, and reduce their reliance on benefits2. The program offers beneficiaries access to free employment services, such as career counseling, job placement, and ongoing support, from authorized providers called Employment Networks (ENs) or State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agencies2. The program also provides work incentives and protections for beneficiaries who participate, such as continuation of health care coverage, expedited reinstatement of benefits, and protection from medical reviews2.

The other options are not funding sources for employment support services. Option A, Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), is a federal tax credit available to employers who hire and retain workers from certain target groups, such as veterans, ex-felons, and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients3. Option B, Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), is a refundable tax credit for low- to moderate-income working individuals and families, especially those with children4. Option D, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including employment, education, transportation, and access to public and private facilities5. References: 1: CESP CandidateHandbook 2: Ticket to Work Program Overview 3: Work Opportunity Tax Credit 4: Earned Income Tax Credit 5: Americans with Disabilities Act

The MOST appropriate way to proceed in this situation is to reframe the employer’s question from diagnosis to reasonable accommodations in the workplace. This is because it respects the job seeker’s right to privacy and self-determination, while also addressing the employer’s concerns about the job performance and productivity. It also helps to focus on the job seeker’s abilities and skills, rather than the disability label or symptoms. By reframing the question, the employment support professional can also educate the employer on the benefits of hiring people with disabilities, such as diversity, loyalty, and innovation. Furthermore, it can also open up a dialogue about the available resources and supports for both the employer and the employee, such as tax credits, assistive technology, or job coaching. References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam, Question 2
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline, Domain 3, Task 3.4
• APSE CESP Code of Conduct, Principle 1, Section 1.2
• APSE CESP Handbook, Page 13, Section 4.2.2

The best practice in assisting a person to find a job of choice is to use a “discovery” process that includes situational assessments based on the individual’s identified interests. This is because this process allows the job coach to learn about the person’s strengths, preferences, skills, and support needs in various settings and situations, rather than relying on formal records or standardized tests that may not capture the person’s true potential or motivation1. The discovery process also involves the person and their family, friends, and other natural supports in identifying their employment goals and developing a career plan2.

References:

• 1: Discovery: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: The Discovery Process: An Introduction2

 According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, Domain 2: Individualized Employment and Career Planning covers the following tasks:

• 2.1 Conduct person-centered career planning to identify individual’s strengths, interests, abilities, and preferences related to employment.
• 2.2 Assist individuals to identify and explore a range of employment options and opportunities.
• 2.3 Assist individuals to develop and implement an employment action plan that includes short-term and long-term goals, objectives, and strategies.
• 2.4 Assist individuals to access and use labor market information and other resources to identify potential employers and employment trends.
• 2.5 Assist individuals to develop and use a portfolio, resume, or other materials to effectively market their skills and abilities to employers.
• 2.6 Assist individuals to prepare for and participate in job interviews and follow-up activities.
• 2.7 Assist individuals to evaluate and negotiate job offers and terms of employment.

The best way to help the 25-year-old woman who is interested in working with animals as a veterinary technician is to schedule an informational interview with a veterinary technician to learn more about the job duties. This option aligns with tasks 2.2, 2.4, and 2.6, as it would help the woman to explore a specific employment option and opportunity, access and use labor market information and other resources related to the veterinary field, and prepare for and participate in a job interview and follow-up activities. An informational interview is a type of networking strategy that allows a job seeker to ask questions and gain insights from a professional who works in their desired occupation or industry2. It can also help to build rapport and establish contacts for future job opportunities2.

The other options are not the best ways to help the woman, as they do not follow the CESP standards and principles. Option A, assisting her to enroll in a veterinary technician program, is premature and may not be suitable for her, as she does not know much about the position and may not meet the educational requirements or have the necessary skills and abilities. Option B, searching the Internet to gather material regarding what a veterinary technician does, is passive and may not provide enough information or guidance for her to make an informed decision. Option C, referring her to another agency because her goals are not appropriate, is disrespectful and discouraging, as it does not respect her choice and preference, and does not support her to pursue her employment goals. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook 2: Informational Interviewing

 The most effective marketing materials are those that communicate the main message and value proposition of your organization and programs in a clear, concise, and compelling way1. State-of-the-art graphics and pictures may be attractive, but they are not essential and may even distract from the content. Including everything that describes your organization and programs may overwhelm the reader and make it hard to identify the key points. Targeting information for all your large audiences may dilute the impact and relevance of your message for each specific group. Therefore, the best option is D, clear, concise written material. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 17.

 Transition planning is a process to help students with disabilities and their families think about their life after high school and prepare for it12. The purpose is to help students develop the skills and connections they need to achieve their post-secondary goals, such as education, employment, and independent living34. Transition planning should start as early as possible, preferably before the student enters high school, to allow enough time for the student to explore their interests, strengths, and needs, and to identify and access the appropriate services and supports56. Starting transition planningtoo late may limit the student’s options and opportunities for a successful transition to adulthood6. References:

• Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
• Understood
• Disability Rights Ohio
• Guide to Transition Planning for Students with Disabilities
• Edutopia
• Transition Planning for Students with Disabilities

The work hours are the least likely factor to be causing his current difficulties at work, because he has been working the same hours for two years without any problems. The other factors (A, C, and D) are more likely to affect his performance and alertness, as they can change over time or have an impact on his mental and physical well-being. For example, his medication may have side effects, his sleeping pattern/schedule may be disrupted, or his general health/mental illness may worsen or fluctuate. These factors may require adjustments or accommodations to help him succeed at work. References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam, Question 1
• CESP Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.2
• CESP Handbook, page 12

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the knowledge areas for Domain 2: Individualized Employment and Career Planning is “Strategies for addressing challenging behaviors in the workplace”. The handbook also states that “The CESP exam is based on the application of knowledge, not just the recall of facts”. Therefore, the best answer is the one that demonstrates the most effective and evidence-based practice for supporting Ann in her new job.

Option B is the best answer because it involves reviewing any relevant data and information that can help identify what triggers Ann’s challenging behaviors, what motivates her to work, and what strategies have been successful in the past. This can help the employment support professional to design a personalized and proactive plan for Ann that can increase her chances of success and satisfaction in her new job.

Option A is not the best answer because it suggests that Ann should be segregated from the integrated community workplace and placed in a sheltered setting until she proves herself. This goes against the core values and principles of APSE and the CESP credential, which promote inclusion, choice, and self-determination for people with disabilities2.

Option C is not the best answer because it implies that Ann is likely to have problems and that the employment support professional is not confident or competent enough to handle them. This can create a negative impression of Ann and her abilities to the employer and the co-workers, and undermine her self-esteem and independence. Moreover, having a back-up staff person is not a guarantee that Ann will not have challenging behaviors, and it does not address the root causes or the solutions for them.

Option D is not the best answer because it focuses on the negative aspects of Ann’s behavior and history, rather than her strengths and interests. This can also create a biased and unfavorable view ofAnn to the employer and the co-workers, and lower their expectations and support for her. Furthermore, describing Ann’s challenging behaviors without providing any context, rationale, or intervention plan is not helpful or professional.

References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook 2: APSE Ethical Guidelines for Professionals in Supported Employment

A reasonable accommodation is any change to the job, the work environment, or the way things are usually done that allows a person with a disability to perform theessential functions of the job and enjoy equal employment opportunities12. A reasonable accommodation may include modifying an employee’s work schedule, such as allowing flexible hours, part-time work, or telework, as long as it does not create an undue hardship for the employer123. An undue hardship is an action that requires significant difficulty or expense for the employer, considering factors such as the nature and cost of the accommodation, the size and financial resources of the employer, and the impact of the accommodation on the operation of the business2. A reasonable accommodation does not include removing essential job functions, which are thefundamental duties of the position2. A reasonable accommodation also does not include reducing production standards, which are the quantity or quality of work expected of all employees in the same position2. A reasonable accommodation does not include allowing inconsistent job attendance, which may affect the performance of the essential functions or the employer’s ability to conduct business2. References:

• Reasonable Accommodations in the Workplace
• Enforcement Guidance on Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship under the ADA
• Accommodations

The LEAST effective way for a family to support a job seeker in obtaining competitive employment is to attend job interviews and new employer orientation sessions to learn more about the job and hiring procedures. This is because it may interfere with the job seeker’s autonomy, self-determination, and self-advocacy skills, which are essential for successful employment outcomes. It may also create a negative impression on the employer, who may perceive the job seeker as dependent, unprepared, or lacking confidence. Furthermore, it may violate the confidentiality and privacy of the job seeker, who may not want to disclose personal information to the family or the employer. Therefore, the family should respect the job seeker’s choices and preferences, and support them from a distance, unless the job seeker explicitly requests their presence or assistance. References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam, Question 3
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline, Domain 2, Task 2.2
• APSE CESP Code of Conduct, Principle 1, Section 1.3
• APSE CESP Handbook, Page 12, Section 4.1.3

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a federal law that establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards for employees in the private sector and in federal, state, and local governments1. The FLSA does not prescribe standards for maternity leave, benefits advisement, or reasonable accommodations. These are covered by other laws, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), respectively234.

References:

• 1: Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Overview1
• 2: Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Overview2
• 3: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Overview3
• 4: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Overview4

According to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a person with a disability is not required to disclose their disability to an employer at any point in the hiring process, unless they need a reasonable accommodation to participate in the application process or to perform the essential functions of the job1. Therefore, Tom is not required to disclose his epilepsy to his employer before, during, or after the interview, unless he needs an accommodation such as flexible work hours, breaks, or a quiet work environment. If he does need an accommodation, he should disclose his disability before the accommodation is requested, and provide relevant documentation to support hisrequest2. References: 1: Disability Disclosure and Interviewing Techniques for Persons with Disabilities 2: CESP Content Outline - CESP

According to the CESP handbook, one of the roles of the employment support professional (ESP) is to collaborate with other service providers, such as residential staff, to ensure the individual’s employment success1. This includes coordinating and communicating with the residential staff about the individual’s employment goals, needs, and preferences1. However, the ESP should respect the boundaries and roles of the residential staff and avoid imposing unreasonable expectations on them1. Therefore, the only reasonable expectation to ask from the residential staff in support of the individual’s employment is to support the individual in maintaining a clean work uniform, as this is a basic hygiene and appearance requirement that can affect the individual’s performance and acceptance at work1. The other options are not reasonable because they are either beyond the scope of the residential staff’s responsibility or interfere with the ESP’s role. For example, ensuring the individual is making friends at work is not a direct support service that the residential staff can provide, and it may also infringe on the individual’s privacy and autonomy1. Calling the employer to discuss issues the employee is having at work is not appropriate for the residential staff, as this may confuse the employer and undermine the ESP’s relationship with the employer and the individual1. Reviewing skills learned at work and practicing tasks that might be difficult to perform is the primary responsibility of the ESP, who has the expertise and training to provide effective job coaching and skill development1. The residential staff should not interfere with the ESP’s instruction or assessment of the individual’s work skills1. References: 1: Certified Employment Support ProfessionalTM [EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION COUNCIL] Certified Employment Support ProfessionalTM 2018 \nCertification Handbook \nLast Updated 11/2/18 \nEmployment Support Professional Certification Council Kari Tietjen, CESPTM Director kari@apse.org June 20, 2018 The Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) Credential The Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) credential recognizes individuals who have demonstrated a sufficient level of of knowledge and skill to provide integrated employment support services to a variety of client populations. The CESP credential is intended to help employers, employees and potential employees by increasing the visibility of – and access to – competent individuals in the profession. Individuals who earn the CESP credential have demonstrated knowledge of the facilitation and advocacy skills necessary to help establish and expand equitable employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities. CESPs also raise awareness of benefits within the business community, and promote social change that fosters an independent, productive lifestyle for individuals with disabilities. About ESPCC The EmploymentSupport Professional Certification Council (ESPCC) was established in 2011 by the APSE Board of Directors to establish and implement policies and procedures for the CESP certification program and to oversee the development the CESP examination. The ESPCC is responsible for developing and overseeing all aspects of the certification program. What is Certification ESPCC developed the Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP) program to set a standard of knowledge and distinguish employment support professionals who have shown they have the skill and competence to perform the requirements of the job. Professional certification is different than a training or educational program. Training programs offer a certificate of attendance when an individual completes the coursework, but they do not give a credential. ESPCC used a nationally recognized process to define the roles and responsibilities of the employment support professional and awards a credential after the individual passes an exam to demonstrate their competence. Meet Eligibility Requirements Submit Application Prepare for the Exam Meet Professional Development Requirements Display your CESP Credential Pass the Exam Potential Job Roles, Practice Settings of Typical Candidates/Certificants The ESPCC developed the CESPTM for employment support professionals (ESPs) who provide employment services to individuals with significant disabilities by assisting individuals to obtain and maintain competitive employment in integrated community workplaces. The CESP credential is designed for job coaches, job developers, transition employment specialists, job placement personnel, and employment specialists/consultants who serve a wide variety of target audiences including individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities, mental health diagnoses, sensory impairments, physical disabilities, traumatic brain injury and autism spectrum disorders.

The best way to know more about a job seeker is to ask him directly about his background and desire for services. This is consistent with the principles of self-determination, empowerment, and person-centered planning that are part of the CESP Domain 2 Individualized Employment and Career Planning1. Asking him directly also shows respect for his autonomy and preferences, and allows him to share his strengths, interests, and goals in his own words. Asking family and clinicians, reading his case file, or placing him in a job without his input may provide some useful information, but they may also be biased, outdated, or irrelevant to his current situation and aspirations. Moreover, they may undermine his confidence and motivation to pursue employment. References: 1: CESP Content Outline - CESP

 The first step that you should take in helping this worker improve her job performance is to ask a bilingual Hispanic co-worker what cues she uses to distinguish the toiletries. This option follows the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, natural supports, and respect. It recognizes the worker’s cultural and linguistic background, and it seeks to find a solution that is based on her strengths and preferences. It also utilizes the existing resources and relationships in the workplace, and it promotes the worker’s independence and inclusion.

The other options are not as good as option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Asking the manager for an accommodation by substituting another job duty for the one that she is having difficulty completing is not a bad option, but it is not the first step that you should take. This option may imply that the worker is not capable of performing the original job duty, and that she needs a special favor or exception from the employer. This option may also limit the worker’s career development and satisfaction, as it may not match her interests or goals. Therefore, this option should be considered only after exploring other possible solutions, such as option A.
• Option C: Asking the manager if the worker can be paired with a co-worker to be her natural support for completing her daily job duties is also not a bad option, but it is not the first step that you should take. This option may depend on the availability and willingness of the co-worker, and it may create a dependency or a burden for the co-worker. This option may also reduce the worker’s autonomy and confidence, as it may suggest that she cannot do the job on her own. Therefore, this option should be considered only after exploring other possible solutions, such as option A.
• Option D: Talking with the individual to determine if the job is a good match and if she needs to look for another job is not a good option, as it does not follow the core values and principles of employment support, such as empowerment, career development, and quality outcomes. This option may discourage the worker and undermine her achievements and potential. It may also create a negative impression of the worker to the employer, and it may jeopardize the worker’s employment status and income. Therefore, this option should be avoided unless there is no other way to resolve the issue.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

The best approach would be to arrange for another benefits analysis to inform the individual how the raise will affect his benefits. A benefits analysis is a service that provides information on how work and earnings may impact the eligibility and amount of SSDI and other public benefits, such as Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, or housing assistance. A benefits analysis can also explain the various work incentives and programs that are available to help SSDI recipients transition to work without losing essentialbenefits and supports. For example, SSDI recipients may qualify for a trial work period, an extended period of eligibility, an expedited reinstatement, or an impairment-related work expense deduction12. A benefits analysis can help the individual and the employment support professional plan for future goals and needs, such as saving for education, training, or assistive technology.

The other options are not appropriate for the employment support professional to do because:

• A. Asking the employer not to give him the raise may be seen as disrespectful or discouraging to the individual’s work performance and career advancement. It may also create conflict or mistrust between the individual and the employer or the employment support professional. The individual has the right to accept or decline the raise based on his or her own preferences and informed choices.
• B. Doing nothing, because the Social Security office will learn about the raise when he files his taxes, may be risky or irresponsible for the individual and the employment support professional. The individual is required to report any changes in his or her work and earnings to the Social Security office as soon as possible, as they may affect his or her SSDI eligibility and amount. Failing to report changes in a timely manner may result in overpayments, underpayments, penalties, or termination of benefits34.
• D. Reminding the individual to inform the Social Security office about the raise may be helpful, but not sufficient, to address the individual’s concerns and questions about how the raise will affect his or her benefits. The individual may need more detailed and specific information on how the raise will affect his or her current and future benefits and supports, and what work incentives and programs he or she may be eligible for or need to apply for. The employment support professional should also follow up with the individual and the Social Security office to ensure that the information is reported and processed correctly. References:
• Working While Disabled: How We Can Help
• The Rules for Working While Receiving Social Security Disability
• Income Limits for SSDI Benefits
• Working Part-Time While Getting Disability Benefits

Greeting is an essential social skill that helps individuals with disabilities to connect and communicate with others in various settings, such as the workplace1. However, greeting can be challenging for some individuals with autism, who may have difficulties with eye contact, body language, tone of voice, and understanding social cues2. Therefore, teaching greeting to individuals with autism requires direct instruction, modeling, practice, feedback, and reinforcement3.

The best strategy to teach greeting to the young woman with autism who started work two weeks ago is to practice with her at work and model saying hello to co-workers during her work shift. This strategy has several advantages:

• It provides natural and frequent opportunities for the young woman to practice greeting in the context where she needs to use it4.
• It allows the employment support professional (ESP) to model appropriate greeting behaviors, such as making eye contact, smiling, and using a friendly tone of voice, and to prompt and reinforce the young woman’s responses5.
• It helps the young woman to generalize the skill across different co-workers, situations, and times of the day6.
• It fosters the development of natural supports and relationships between the young woman and her co-workers, which can enhance her integration and retention in the workplace7.

The other strategies are not as effective as the one above, because:

• Helping her prepare an index card reminder to say hello in response to being greeted may be helpful as a visual cue, but it does not address the underlying skill deficits or the need for practice and feedback8.
• Enrolling her in a social club that is offered by your agency to help her develop friendships may be beneficial for her social and emotional well-being, but it does not directly target the skill of greeting in the workplace, which may have different rules and expectations than a social club9.
• Practicing conversations with her in your office until she says hello on cue 9 out of 10 times may be useful as a preliminary step, but it does not ensure that she can transfer the skill to the natural environment, where she may encounter different stimuli and distractions.

References: 1: Communication & Social Skills Toolkit April 2021 Skill 6 Greetings 2: Teaching greeting to children with autism - LuxAI S.A. 3: Teaching Greetings: How to Respond to Hello | Blue Parachute 4: Naturalistic Intervention Fact Sheet - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 5: Modeling - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 6: Generalization and Maintenance of Skills - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 7: Natural Supports in the Workplace: A Reexamination of Supported Employment 8: Visual Supports - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder 9: Social Skills and Autism Spectrum Disorder - Autism Speaks : Discrete Trial Training - National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder

 According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to facilitate self-employment and customized employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities1. Self-employment is a form of integrated employment that allows individuals to create their own businesses based on their strengths, preferences, and interests2. Customized employment is a process of individualizing the employment relationship between a job seeker and an employer based on the needs of both3. To facilitate self-employment and customized employment, an employment support professional may need to collaborate with various team members, such as small business development consultants, family members or friends, and other community partners4. However, a representative of the individual’s medical team may not be the most important team member to support his businessventure, as the medical team’s role is more focused on the individual’s health and rehabilitation needs, rather than his vocational goals and aspirations. While the medical team may provide some input on the individual’s abilities and limitations, they may not have the expertise or the authority to assist with the business and marketing plan, the coordination of resources and supports, or the networking, bookkeeping, and transportation aspects of the self-employment venture. Therefore, a representative of the individual’s medical team is the least important team member to support his business venture, compared to the other options. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: Self-Employment for People with Disabilities 3: Customized Employment 4: Self-Employment Toolkit

According to the CESP Candidate Handbook1, one of the core competencies of Domain 1 (Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice) is to “provide information and support to individuals and theirfamilies regarding the impact of employment on benefits”. This involves educating the individual and their family about the various work incentives and programs that can help them retain some or all of their disability benefits while working, such as the earned income exclusion, the student earned income exclusion, the Plan to Achieve Self-Support, the Ticket to Work program, and others. Providing informational literature on disability benefits and work incentives and offering to refer the individual to have a benefits analysis is the best way to dispel the myths about losing SSI due to earned wages, as it will help the individual understand their rights and options, and make informed decisions about their employment goals. Suggesting that the individual can appeal the decision of the Social Security Administration, call them for more information, or hide their work activity are not effective or ethical ways to address the individual’s concerns, as they do not provide accurate or comprehensive information, and may create more confusion or fear for the individual. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 4.

 I cannot provide a full explanation for you, but I can point you to some sources that may help you understand the concept of person-centered planning and its benefits for both the individual and the employer. According to the Administration for Community Living1, person-centered planning (PCP) is a process for selecting and organizing the services and supports that an individual may need to live in the community. It is a process that is directed by the person who receives the support1. According to the National Parent Center on Transition and Employment2, person-centered planning is an ongoing problem-solving process used to help people with disabilities plan for their future. In person-centered planning, groups of people focus on an individual and that person’s vision of what they would like to do in the future2. According to the University of Florida3, person-centered planning is a collection of tools and approaches based on a set of shared values that can be used to plan with a person - not for them. These tools can be used to help the person think about what is important in their lives now and also to think about what would make a good future3. Therefore, you may want to consider which option best aligns with these values and goals when choosing your answer. References: 4: Person-centred planning - Wikipedia 2: Person-Centered Planning - National Parent Center on Transition and Employment 1: Person Centered Planning | ACL Administration for Community Living 3: What is Person-Centered Planning? - University of Florida

The last strategy to use in helping him is to find a new job for him. This option implies that the individual is not capable of performing the job he was hired for, and that there are no possible solutions to improve his situation. This option goes against the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, inclusion, empowerment, and self-determination1. Finding a new job for him would also disregard his preferences, goals, and skills, as well as the employer’s needs and expectations.

The other options are more appropriate because they involve exploring ways to enhance the individual’s performance and satisfaction at his current job. Option B is a good strategy because it can help identify the best assistive technology and ergonomic adjustments that can suit the individual’s needs and abilities2. Option C is also a good strategy because it can help measure the individual’s productivity and efficiency, as well as provide feedback and training to improve his typing skills3. Option D is another good strategy because it can help establish a positive and collaborative relationship with the employer, as well as understand the employer’s perspective and standards for the job4. References:

• 1: APSE, Application of Core Values and Principles to Practice
• 2: Job Accommodation Network, Accommodation and Compliance: Spinal Cord Injuries
• 3: CareerOneStop, Computer Programmers: Skills and Abilities
• 4: APSE, Workplace and Related Supports

A PASS is a written plan of action for pursuing and getting a particular type of job. It describes the steps, items, and services that a person with a disability needs to reach their work goal. A PASS allows a person to set aside income or resources that would otherwise affect their eligibility for SSI. The money in the PASS account can be used to pay for expenses related to thework goal, such as education, training, equipment, or business start-up costs123. The other options (B, C, and D) are not accurate descriptions of the PASS program. References: 1: Plan toAchieve Self-Support (PASS) | Disability Research | SSA 2: Plan to Achieve Self-Support (PASS) - Social Security Administration 3: Plan for Achieving Self Support–Wikipedia

A vocational profile is a tool that helps identify the job seeker’s interests, skills, abilities, preferences, and support needs for employment. A vocational profile should include information that is relevant, accurate, and individualized to the job seeker. The information should be gathered from multiple sources, such as interviews, observations, assessments, and records. The information should also reflect the job seeker’s voice and choice, and respect their right to self-determination and empowerment. Therefore, the LEAST appropriate piece of information to include in a vocational profile is the parent’s desire for the job seeker to work in a warehouse, as this may not align with the job seeker’s own goals, preferences, or abilities. The parent’s desire may also limit the job seeker’s options and opportunities for competitive, integrated employment. The other options are more appropriate to include in a vocational profile, as they provide useful information about the job seeker’s work environment preferences, reading ability, and success conditions. References: CESP Examination Content Outline, Certified Employment Support Professional

 A task analysis is a process of breaking down a complex job into smaller, manageable steps or tasks that can be taught, learned, and evaluated1. The purpose of a task analysis is to identify the essential skills, knowledge, and abilities required for successful job performance, and to provide a basis for developing effective training and support strategies2. Therefore, a task analysis should be based on accurate and relevant information about the job and the individual who will perform it.

In this case, the employment support professional is writing a task analysis for a very detailed position. Options A, C, and D are all important steps in creating a task analysis, as they involve gathering information from different sources, such as the job description, the co-worker, and the individual. These sources can provide valuable insights into the expectations, standards, and challenges of the job, as well as the strengths, needs, and preferences of the individual. Option B, however, is the least important step in creating a task analysis, as performing the job duties yourself may not be necessary, feasible, or appropriate for the employment support professional. Performing the job duties yourself may not reflect the actual experience or perspective of the individual who will perform the job, and it may not capture the variations or adaptations that may be needed for different situations or contexts. Therefore, option B is not a crucial step in creating a task analysis. References: 1: CESP study guide Flashcards, question 8 2: CESP Examination Content Outline, Domain 4, 4N

Job coach services are an example of an Impairment Related Work Expense (IRWE). An IRWE is a cost for an item or service that a person with a disability needs in order to work because of their impairment1. Social Security will deduct the costs of an IRWE from the person’s countable income when determining their eligibility for Social Security disability benefits or Supplemental Security Income (SSI)1. Job coach services are a type of assistance that a person with a disability may require in order to perform their job duties, learn new skills, or adjust to the work environment2. Job coach services are not reimbursed by another source, such as the employer or a vocational rehabilitation agency, and the cost is reasonable, meaning that it represents the standard charge for the service in the community1. Therefore, job coach services meet the criteria for an IRWE and can be deducted from the person’s earnings.

The other options are not examples of an IRWE. Accommodations are changes or modifications that an employer makes to the work environment, equipment, or schedule to enable a person with a disability to perform their job3. Accommodations are not an IRWE because they are not paid by the person with a disability, but by the employer as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)3. An individualized plan for employment (IPE) is a document that outlines the goals, services, and supports that a person with a disability needs to achieve their desired employment outcome4. An IPE is not an IRWE because it is not a cost for an item or service, but a plan that guides the person’s vocational rehabilitation process4. Transportation is a cost for getting to andfrom work, such as bus fare, taxi, or car expenses5. Transportation is not an IRWE unless the person with a disability needs a special transportation service because of their impairment, such as a wheelchair-accessible van or a personal driver5. If the person usesthe same transportation service as the general public, the cost is not deductible as an IRWE5.

References: 1: Impairment-Related Work Expenses - Social Security 2: Job Coach Services - CareerOneStop 3: Reasonable Accommodations - U.S. Department of Labor 4: Individualized Plan for Employment - Social Security 5: DI 10520.001 Impairment-Related Work Expenses (IRWE) - Social Security

 it follows the principle of individualized employment and career planning, which is one of the domains of knowledge covered by the CESP exam. This principle states that employment support professionals should help individuals with disabilities to identifytheir preferences, interests, strengths, and needs for employment, and to pursue their desired outcomes and goals1. Therefore, before taking any further steps, the employment support professional should determine if one of the individuals they support wants to do the job for which the employer is hiring, and if it matches their career aspirations and abilities.

Answer A is incorrect, because it assumes that the individuals they support need to learn the skills desired by the employer, without considering their own interests and choices. This may lead to dissatisfaction, poor performance, or high turnover rates. Answer B is incorrect, because it is not a good practice to bring several individuals to interview, hoping that one matches a job opening. This may waste the employer’s time and resources, and create a negative impression of the employment support professional and the individuals they support. Answer D is incorrect, because it is also not a good practice to take an individual to an interview and hope they have the skills that the employer is seeking. This may result in a poor job match, and lower the chances of success and retention for the individual. References: 1: CESP Exam Content Outline